Pagoda SL Group

W113 Pagoda SL Group => Drive train, fuel, suspension, steering & brakes => Topic started by: DavidBrough on April 02, 2008, 02:52:02

Title: 3.46 Rear Axle Rebuild
Post by: DavidBrough on April 02, 2008, 02:52:02
I am in the process of re building a 3.46 axle from a 1971 280SE 3.5 and now need to order some new seals and rubbers and confirm which SL bits will just transfer across. Does anyone know which parts are not interchangeable with the SL axles. I know the wheels bearings are both taper rollers on the SE and whilst the diff casing and internals are different it seems that all other parts should be the same as for the SL i.e. disks, callipers, Diff carrier, handbrake parts, trailing arm mounts, bearing seals etc. Does anyone know if this is correct?

David Brough
1969 280SL Auto with A/C
Title: Re: 3.46 Rear Axle Rebuild
Post by: ja17 on April 02, 2008, 04:36:25
Hello Davic,

Everything should be the same except the handbrake cables. You will need to get plugs to close the connection for the cooling tube.  Two oil pan drain plugs (14mm allen style) will work nicely. The expensive barrel roller wheel bearing was desinged to be able to hinge along with the axle casting on the right side. I always use one of these on the right side. I have never seen one of these fail. They are very durable. On the other hand I have replaced many standard roller ball bearings on these axles.

Joe Alexander
Blacklick, Ohio
Title: Re: 3.46 Rear Axle Rebuild
Post by: DavidBrough on April 02, 2008, 06:44:18
Thanks Joe, it's nice to know for sure. I have already purchased two drain plugs and sealing rings to replace the breather pipe.

David Brough
1969 280SL Auto with A/C
Title: Re: 3.46 Rear Axle Rebuild
Post by: DavidBrough on April 02, 2008, 11:27:20
I've now ordered the new parts I need from SLS in Germany and they say the only other difference between the 108 and 113 axles is that the brake caliper pistons are larger in the 108.

David Brough
1969 280SL Auto with A/C
Title: Re: 3.46 Rear Axle Rebuild
Post by: ja17 on April 02, 2008, 18:30:04
Hello David,

That is new information for me on the brake calipers being different. It would be nice if someone could verify different part numbers for the W113 rear caliper and a 250S (W108) rear caliper so this doesn't keep me awake tonight!

Its nice to know these things.

Joe Alexander
Blacklick, Ohio
Title: Re: 3.46 Rear Axle Rebuild
Post by: ja17 on April 02, 2008, 20:05:08
Hello David,

I Had to do a little research on the matter of rear brake calipers. It appears that all the W113 cars with disc brakes shared the same rear calipers as all the W108 sedans with six cylinder engines. These had rear caliper pistons which were 42mm diameter. See page 444 of the 1969 Technical Data Booklet.   However the W108 sedans with V-8 engines had rear calipers with pistons having 35mm diameter! see page 452 of 1972 Technical Data Booklet for this information.

Joe Alexander
Blacklick, Ohio
Title: Re: 3.46 Rear Axle Rebuild
Post by: Naj ✝︎ on April 03, 2008, 03:31:32
quote:
Originally posted by ja17

Hello David,

That is new information for me on the brake calipers being different. It would be nice if someone could verify different part numbers for the W113 rear caliper and a 250S (W108) rear caliper so this doesn't keep me awake tonight!

Its nice to know these things.

Joe Alexander
Blacklick, Ohio



113 Rear Calipers (Same as 250S, 280SE...)
000 420 4683 left
000 420 4783 right

280SE 3.5:
002 421 5498 left
002 421 5598 right.

The good news is that the mounting holes on the axle tube should be the same. All use the same mounting plate with the 2 captive nuts: 108 420 0286.

Now, the W100 rear axle - thats something else!!!

Picture to follow.

(http://www.sl113.org/forums/uploaded/naj/20084312429_W100_RBrake.jpg)

naj
Title: Re: 3.46 Rear Axle Rebuild
Post by: DavidBrough on April 07, 2008, 11:36:16
Work is progressing with my axle rebuild but I think I may have hit a snag. On close inspection I find that the RH carrier race has wear lines on its edges and moves freely in the diff casing and I assume it’s supposed to be a tight fit. On the basis that I have to replace the bearings does anyone have the specification for the carrier bearing pre load and backlash. I intend to get a local specialist to do the work but I would like to be armed with the correct data if anyone has it.

I attach a picture of the bearing race and the large castellated ring nut which I assume is used to apply the bearing pre load to the right hand side with shims to the left hand side providing the correct mesh pattern with the pinion. Dose this sound correct?



David Brough
1969 280Sl Auto with A/C


Download Attachment: (http://images/icon_paperclip.gif) Diff Inner Bearing.jpg (http://www.sl113.org/forums/uploaded/davidbrough/200847133529_Diff%20Inner%20Bearing.jpg)
167.2 KB

Download Attachment: (http://images/icon_paperclip.gif) Bearing Retainer.jpg (http://www.sl113.org/forums/uploaded/davidbrough/200847133557_Bearing%20Retainer.jpg)
169.48 KB
Title: Re: 3.46 Rear Axle Rebuild
Post by: DavidBrough on May 11, 2008, 06:01:11
Making continued progress on the axle rebuild but I’m having a bit of trouble with the detail of final set up and torque settings and hope someone can enlighten me.
 
Firstly, I am looking at setting the distance “A” of the diff carrier at 158mm +/-1mm but am not sure where exactly to take the measure as fig 35-5/7 of the BBB shows the measure to the body of the carrier below the machine top locating portion whereas fig 35-5/8 shows the measure to the machined top portion itself. As mine shows a difference of over 1mm between the two possible measures could anyone let me know which is correct.

Secondly I am finding some of the descriptions for the torque settings in 35-0/8 a bit confusing, it states:-

Hex bolts for attaching strut to supporting tube   20mkp
Hex nut for attaching strut to chassis frame      10mkp

I understand the strut to be the cross strut as per photo but this attaches to the diff carrier not the supporting tube and 20mkp seems far too tight for any of the nuts. Does strut mean radius arm in this instance or should the cross strut nuts really be that tight?




David Brough
1969 280SL Auto with A/C



Download Attachment: (http://images/icon_paperclip.gif) Carrier35-5-7.jpg (http://www.sl113.org/forums/uploaded/davidbrough/20085118011_Carrier35-5-7.jpg)
178.67 KB

Download Attachment: (http://images/icon_paperclip.gif) Carrier35-5-8.jpg (http://www.sl113.org/forums/uploaded/davidbrough/20085118034_Carrier35-5-8.jpg)
168.12 KB

Download Attachment: (http://images/icon_paperclip.gif) Cross Strut.jpg (http://www.sl113.org/forums/uploaded/davidbrough/20085118058_Cross%20Strut.jpg)
206.7 KB
Title: Re: 3.46 Rear Axle Rebuild
Post by: jeffc280sl on May 11, 2008, 08:15:03
Figure 35-5/7 shows a reference line from front edge of the machine top extending down through the carrier arm.  I believe thios line is supposed to represent the same location as used in figure 35-5/8.  Any variance can be set when you check the alignment of the axle after mounting.

My understanding of the torque settings is the same.  I hope someone else can help.

Jeff C.
1970 280SL 4-speed
Title: Re: 3.46 Rear Axle Rebuild
Post by: DavidBrough on May 11, 2008, 10:41:42
Thanks Jeff, hopefully someone can enlighten us regarding the torque settings.


David Brough
1969 280Sl Auto with A/C
Title: Re: 3.46 Rear Axle Rebuild
Post by: DavidBrough on May 27, 2008, 05:06:45
Well I suppose our typical Bank Holiday weather has a lot to answer for as I took the opportunity to spend three days in the garage and swap over my axles. I did the job on my own and everything was quite straight forward once you put your mind to it. I’ve only had chance for a quick spin round the block at this stage to check for any funny noises and make sure nothing fell off but it doesn’t half feel good, much quieter and no discernable difference when pulling away, I will have to test hill starts though. Will let you know how I get on when I’ve had chance for a proper drive. I now have a good 3.92 axle going cheap if anyone needs one.

David Brough
280SL Auto with A/C & 3.46 axle
Title: Re: 3.46 Rear Axle Rebuild
Post by: DavidBrough on June 01, 2008, 03:17:28
Unfortunately I seem to have an issue with my new axle as whilst it runs very well it is pushing oil out of the breather on top of the diff. When returning from a fast run I noticed some drips of oil on the floor and there was a clear line of oil down the back of the diff and the top of the breather had clearly visible oil all over it, there were no apparent leaks from anywhere else. I have removed and plugged the large breather pipe as others have done and the oil level is correct being just below the level plug hole. Could this be something to do with the removal of the large breather link pipe or may there be some other issue. At this stage I can only think of having a section of the rear chassis re shaped and refitting the link pipe to relive what appears to be a build up of pressure in the diff. I have removed and checked the small breather which is clearly the culprit and the felt pad is in place and I have applied sealer to the threads but to no avail.

Does anyone have any ideas or suggestions.


David Brough
1969 280SL Auto with A/C & 3.46 axle

Title: Re: 3.46 Rear Axle Rebuild
Post by: Naj ✝︎ on June 01, 2008, 04:19:27
David,

 
quote:
...the oil level is correct being just below the level plug hole.


With the car level on the ground too?

I'm thinking you may have too much oil in there...

naj
Title: Re: 3.46 Rear Axle Rebuild
Post by: DavidBrough on June 01, 2008, 05:56:59
Hi Naj,

That was my first thought but I have checked it several times on the level and no oil comes out with the level bolt removed. Do you know if it's possible for excess oil to remain in the axle tubes even when on the flat?

David Brough
1969 280SL Auto with A/C & 3.46 Axle
Title: Re: 3.46 Rear Axle Rebuild
Post by: paulr on June 01, 2008, 08:06:05
David,

I had this same issue with mine and even found a little oil on the rear under the bumpers but it has now settled down and having had it checked at Roger Edwards, it's all fine .Along with my 123 ignition it's the best thing I have done to the car. I hope you don't worry too much and enjoy it.

p.
Title: Re: 3.46 Rear Axle Rebuild
Post by: DavidBrough on June 01, 2008, 08:35:00
Hi Paul,

Do you have the link breatehr pipe in place as I know the boys at Roger Edwards do advocate this? This axle ratio is terrific though it turns the SL into the car I always wanted it to be.

David Brough
1969 280SL Auto with A/C & 3.46 Axle
Title: Re: 3.46 Rear Axle Rebuild
Post by: Naj ✝︎ on June 01, 2008, 08:45:07
Hi, David,

quote:
Originally posted by DavidBrough

Hi Naj,

That was my first thought but I have checked it several times on the level and no oil comes out with the level bolt removed. Do you know if it's possible for excess oil to remain in the axle tubes even when on the flat?

David Brough
1969 280SL Auto with A/C & 3.46 Axle



I think it was A Dalton who suggested that the level of oil shud be just below the filler plug' so you can 'feel' it with your 'pinky'!!

Were you able to get the correct oil for the LSD?

naj
Title: Re: 3.46 Rear Axle Rebuild
Post by: DavidBrough on June 01, 2008, 09:50:49
Hi Naj,

Mine’s just the standard one, no fancy LSD tricks like yours I’m afraid. I did use Arthur's “pinky” trick to check the oil level by the way and used straight EP 90.


David Brough
1969 280SL Auto with A/C & 3.46 Axle
Title: Re: 3.46 Rear Axle Rebuild
Post by: paulr on June 01, 2008, 10:04:01
blimey, I have no idea. They have carte blanche to do what is necessary, so only they know. Why not phone them and ask. Paul does my car and he is very helpful.

p

quote:
Originally posted by DavidBrough

Hi Paul,

Do you have the link breatehr pipe in place as I know the boys at Roger Edwards do advocate this? This axle ratio is terrific though it turns the SL into the car I always wanted it to be.

David Brough
1969 280SL Auto with A/C & 3.46 Axle

Title: Re: 3.46 Rear Axle Rebuild
Post by: DavidBrough on June 01, 2008, 10:23:41
Hi Paul,

As Roger Edwards did yours you will have the breather in place as I know they always cut out a portion of the left hand chassis so it will fit and that’s what I’m thinking of having done in an effort to relieve what seems to be extra diff case pressure. However, there are a lot of people who have fitted the 3.27 axle which is similar and just removed the link pipe and plugged the holes.


David Brough
1969 280Sl Auto with A/C & 3.46 Axle
Title: Re: 3.46 Rear Axle Rebuild
Post by: jeffc280sl on June 01, 2008, 11:04:07
My 3,27 rear axle has plugs in place of the cooling tube ends.  There is no gear oil leaking from the breather outlet.  Is your breather located in the same place?

Download Attachment: (http://images/icon_paperclip.gif) 327 breather.JPG (http://www.sl113.org/forums/uploaded/jeffc280sl/2008611340_327%20breather.JPG)
65.36 KB
Title: Re: 3.46 Rear Axle Rebuild
Post by: DavidBrough on June 01, 2008, 11:27:39
Hi Jeff,

Yes, mine's in the same place as yours and I'm at a bit of loss to understand why the axle should show signs oil being forced out of it when the level's correct.


David Brough
1969 280SL Auto with A/C * 3.46 Axle
Title: Re: 3.46 Rear Axle Rebuild
Post by: Naj ✝︎ on June 01, 2008, 15:50:56
Hi, David,
quote:
Originally posted by paulr

blimey, I have no idea. They have carte blanche to do what is necessary, so only they know. Why not phone them and ask. Paul does my car and he is very helpful.

p

quote:
Originally posted by DavidBrough

Hi Paul,

Do you have the link breatehr pipe in place as I know the boys at Roger Edwards do advocate this? This axle ratio is terrific though it turns the SL into the car I always wanted it to be.

David Brough
1969 280SL Auto with A/C & 3.46 Axle





Paul has a 3.69 which uses the normal (smaller) Pagoda type casing.
No cooling tube fitted.

Jeff's comment is interesting:
Where is the breather?

naj

naj
Title: Re: 3.46 Rear Axle Rebuild
Post by: jeffc280sl on June 01, 2008, 16:17:57
The breather is circled in red.  

Download Attachment: (http://images/icon_paperclip.gif) 327 breather.JPG (http://www.sl113.org/forums/uploaded/jeffc280sl/200861181311_327%20breather.JPG)
62.26 KB

I can't understand why it is leaking.  I'm sure the spinning gears kick up a lot of oil and splash it all around inside the diff case.  The gear oil is not otherwise under any pressure so as to defy gravity.  It must be the felt is too thin and what oil force is created by the spinning gears is sufficient to soak it through.
Title: Re: 3.46 Rear Axle Rebuild
Post by: DavidBrough on June 02, 2008, 00:55:49
Hi Jeff,

I did dismantle the breather and replace the felt pad and my replacement was a little smaller so the first time it leaked I took it apart and put the original one back but no joy. I don’t think the breather had been dismantled before so I think the pad is original.


David Brough
1969 280SL Auto with A/C & 3.46 Axle
Title: Re: 3.46 Rear Axle Rebuild
Post by: jeffc280sl on June 02, 2008, 06:53:10
I remember taking mine apart also.  Just can't recall the specifics internal to the breather.  We know this is where the leak is comming from so I would try different size felt filters to stop the flow while permitting some air in or out as required.
Title: Re: 3.46 Rear Axle Rebuild
Post by: DavidBrough on June 11, 2008, 06:01:42
Oil leak update.

After much messing around with the breather I seem to have failed in my attempts to stop or even stem the leak so I decided to have a flexible pipe made up to replace the old cooling tube. This seemed like a good idea at the time but there was still insufficient room and I couldn’t entirely keep it away from the chassis or prop shaft, however, whilst it was briefly fitted the axle didn’t leak. As a result I decided to talk to the UK Pagoda Gurus Roger Edwards Motors who said that they had fitted quite few 3.46 axles and had found that some leaked and some didn’t with no apparent reason as to why. Their initial fix was to extend the breather on the back of the diff into the boot/trunk with a brake hose and a small catch tank to collect any oil and allow it drain back. Whilst this seemed to fix the problem they had decided that the best solution was to always leave the cooling pipe in place by modifying the chassis slightly. My car is now booked in for the chassis mod and I will let you know how I get on with it.


David Brough
1969 280Sl Auto with A/C & 3.46 Axle (leaking)

Title: Re: 3.46 Rear Axle Rebuild
Post by: Naj ✝︎ on June 11, 2008, 10:08:50
Hello, David,

Having to mess around with the structure of the car seems to me to be too drastic a measure....

I wonder if its worth trying a different brand or spec of oil (after flushing)? I think your current oil may be foaming too much?

I just took some pictures of the diff casing. There is plenty of room in there and the crown wheel is turning CCW but the breather outlet is facing away from the oil spray...

(http://www.sl113.org/forums/uploaded/naj/20086111286_RA632.jpg)

naj
Title: Re: 3.46 Rear Axle Rebuild
Post by: DavidBrough on June 12, 2008, 03:46:27
Hi Naj,

I know what you mean but I don’t think the mod is that drastic as only a small corner of the rear left side needs to be relieved a little to allow suspension movement and Roger Edwards Motors seem to think that should cure it.

David Brough
1969 280SL Auto with A/C & 3.46 Axle (still leaking)
Title: Re: 3.46 Rear Axle Rebuild
Post by: Naj ✝︎ on June 12, 2008, 05:39:00
quote:
Originally posted by DavidBrough

Hi Naj,

I know what you mean but I don’t think the mod is that drastic as only a small corner of the rear left side needs to be relieved a little to allow suspension movement and Roger Edwards Motors seem to think that should cure it.

David Brough
1969 280SL Auto with A/C & 3.46 Axle (still leaking)




OK.

Can you do 'before' and 'after' pictures please?

naj
Title: Re: 3.46 Rear Axle Rebuild
Post by: DavidBrough on June 12, 2008, 13:08:10
Here’s a few before photo’s, the area in question is the inside of the left hand chassis rail just after it curves forward, the square section of the corner needs to have a slight angle  to allow travel of the cooling pipe during suspension movement, it will actually fit whilst static but catches during suspension movement.


David Brough
1969 280SL Auto with A/C & 3.46 Axle (leaking)


Download Attachment: (http://images/icon_paperclip.gif) Pic1.jpg (http://www.sl113.org/forums/uploaded/davidbrough/200861215648_Pic1.jpg)
70.42 KB

Download Attachment: (http://images/icon_paperclip.gif) Pic2.jpg (http://www.sl113.org/forums/uploaded/davidbrough/20086121576_Pic2.jpg)
80.97 KB

Download Attachment: (http://images/icon_paperclip.gif) Pic3.jpg (http://www.sl113.org/forums/uploaded/davidbrough/200861215725_Pic3.jpg)
72.33 KB
Title: Re: 3.46 Rear Axle Rebuild
Post by: DavidBrough on June 21, 2008, 04:01:04
Success, axle oil leak now cured after fitting the large breather/cooling tube, pictures of chassis modification attached. Quite why it should leak in the first place is still a mystery but at least it’s cured now.


David Brough
1969 280SL Auto with A/C & 3.46 Axle



Download Attachment: (http://images/icon_paperclip.gif) BreatherTube1.jpg (http://www.sl113.org/forums/uploaded/davidbrough/20086216019_BreatherTube1.jpg)
132.89 KB

Download Attachment: (http://images/icon_paperclip.gif) BreatherTube2.jpg (http://www.sl113.org/forums/uploaded/davidbrough/20086216041_BreatherTube2.jpg)
111.61 KB

Download Attachment: (http://images/icon_paperclip.gif) BreatherTube3.jpg (http://www.sl113.org/forums/uploaded/davidbrough/20086216058_BreatherTube3.jpg)
77.36 KB
Title: Re: 3.46 Rear Axle Rebuild
Post by: JamesL on July 03, 2008, 23:39:33
So trawling this thread, and the SLS site, would I be right in saying that:

 
Thanks
Title: Re: 3.46 Rear Axle Rebuild
Post by: DavidBrough on July 04, 2008, 00:55:14
Hi Tosh,

Yes, that’s about it. However, an internal gear change is a whole lot harder than an axle change and I would say you’re much better off swapping axles either way.

I thought about getting a 3.69 but decided that if I was going to do all that work I may as well go for the 3.46 on the basis that the 3.69 is much better than the 3.92 and the 3.46 is the same again on  the 3.69.


David Brough
1969 280SL Auto with A/C & 3.46 Axle

Title: Re: 3.46 Rear Axle Rebuild
Post by: Garry on July 04, 2008, 05:53:32
Hi David,

I have been reading with interest the change over of youraxle.  Whilst I am waiting to find a ZF 5 speed to replace my 4 speed and match my data card, which will probably take me years, I wouldnt mind changing over the rear axle.  Is it only the early 70's 280SE 3.5 that had a suitable 3.46 axle or are there other models that could do the job?

 Whilst I really would like to use a 3.27, that model was never sold in Oz (and I suspect the cost of shipping one from USA does not make it worth while) and the 3.46 appears to be the alternative I guess.

Thanks
Garry
Title: Re: 3.46 Rear Axle Rebuild
Post by: DavidBrough on July 04, 2008, 09:02:33
Hi Garry,

I’m fairly sure you will have to look for a 108 or 109 body 280 V8, not a 300 which had air suspension. I think Joe JA17 has posted a comprehensive list at some stage. You might want to try a search and see. I would highly recommend the change which isn’t that difficult to do once you put your mind to it.


David Brough
1969 280SL Auto with A/C & 3.46 Axle
Title: Re: 3.46 Rear Axle Rebuild
Post by: Garry on July 05, 2008, 00:53:08
Hi David,
Thanks for info.
I have located a  3.46:1 from a  280SE 3.5. and think I will go down this path at this point whilst waiting waiting for a ZF gear box to become available.

 Can I asume that the 280SE 3.5 is the one that will have the different brake caliper sizes that you discussed with Joe .  Did you have to change them over?
I am going to give a local mechanic that has done some of the work on my car, the whole screed that you wrote on the rear axle rebuild and see if he is happy fitting it and also doing the minor body mod.

Any further comment I should tell/ask him?
Thanks
Garry
Title: Re: 3.46 Rear Axle Rebuild
Post by: DavidBrough on July 05, 2008, 08:09:40
Hi Garry,

The difference in brake calipers is purely internal and any issue should only arise if you need to replace any of the parts. In that case you will just need to order 108 parts not 113. I assume the larger pistons give greater braking pressure. In my case the 108 calipers were scrap so I just used my existing ones.

The only real issue to consider is whether to go for the chassis modification and fit the cooling tube from the off as this is certainly much easier to do with the axle out. Many others who have fitted this type of axle found no problem with removing the cooling tube and the advice I had was that some seem OK without it and some don’t. Unfortunately you won’t know until the axles fitted and running although it is still possible to do this afterwards, as I did, but you will need to find a confident Pagoda mechanic.

Good luck, it’s certainly a change well worth doing.


David Brough
1969 280SL Auto with A/C & 3.46 Axle

Title: Re: 3.46 Rear Axle Rebuild
Post by: Garry on July 05, 2008, 18:01:31
Thanks David,

Am seeing the mechanic tomorrow.
I note on some of the 3.27 mods that they put a plug in the breather tube outlet.  Is the breather tube critical in a 6 cylinder car vs the V8 thus if finding that it doesnt fit, you could then plug it?

Garry
Title: Re: 3.46 Rear Axle Rebuild
Post by: DavidBrough on July 05, 2008, 23:58:24
Only if you have one of the axles that leak without it.

David Brough
1969 280SL Auto with A/C & 3.46 Axle
Title: Re: 3.46 Rear Axle Rebuild
Post by: JamesL on October 24, 2008, 10:48:26
Yeehah!

Have found a good 3.46 limited slip diff from a W108 220SE. I know, wrong car. The guy I am buying it from sold the original axle to a customer with a broken Pagoda axle. Found a w108 for parts, re-furbed the axle and put it under his 220. And now I have bought it as he will swap my axle into his 220.

Anyhoo... once I have it, do I need to recalibrate the speedo?
Title: Re: 3.46 Rear Axle Rebuild
Post by: waqas on October 24, 2008, 11:06:32
quote:
Originally posted by Tosh

Anyhoo... once I have it, do I need to recalibrate the speedo?



Yes, I believe so.  Good time to have it serviced (lubricated, etc).
Title: Re: 3.46 Rear Axle Rebuild
Post by: Garry on October 24, 2008, 16:23:04
Hi James,

My 3.46 now fitted is fantastic and really makes the driving much better especally first and top, then again mine is a 4 speed manual. I have fitted 215.60.14 tyres and I am finding that at 52mph reading on speedo I am doing 100kph or 62mph actual and the revs are running around 2750.

I have noticed on the floor of the garage that there are a couple of drops of oil but I have not had time to get it up on a hoist yet to see if I can fix that.

Good luck with fitting it.  ps Try to avoid replacing the brake cables they are very expensive. I had to get some in from Germany and got stung AUD$700.
Title: Re: 3.46 Rear Axle Rebuild
Post by: DavidBrough on October 27, 2008, 07:56:28
Hi Garry,

That price for the brake cables sounds very excessive as SLS list them at Euro 40 each. When I fitted mine I had a devil of a job removing the cables from my new and old axle as they were completely rusted in but decided to persevere and eventually got them out with lots of heat, I even melted the cable on one. Thankfully I managed to get two good ones from the four. If you have to order new ones be careful as the ends differ where they meet the actuating lever at the wheel hub, if in doubt get the actuators to match the cable at the time as they are only Euro 6 each



David Brough
1969 280SL Auto with A/C & 3.46 Axle