Author Topic: lead free fuel  (Read 10716 times)

knockmacool

  • Guest
lead free fuel
« on: January 31, 2009, 13:42:21 »
Hi

I have now done 1000miles on my 66 230sl, and while it is much louder than my long gone 58 220S convertible I am very happy with it. (Thanks Stick!). A couple of quick questions on fuel. In Ireland, all that is available is lead free 95 octane. Should I look at fuel additives? If so which ones do you recommend? Should I consider getting the work done to accommodate lead free fuel?


dseretakis

  • Guest
Re: lead free fuel
« Reply #1 on: January 31, 2009, 13:54:23 »
Your car does not require leaded fuel.

JamesL

  • Full Member
  • Platinum
  • ******
  • United Kingdom, London, London
  • Posts: 3610
Re: lead free fuel
« Reply #2 on: January 31, 2009, 20:13:45 »
And as such, will run on whatever you pump. My car has never been "converted" to run lead free and the view is that MB built the valves out of good enough material in the first place not to need harder materials to compensate for the loss of lead.

And if you search on here you'll see stuff about buying "premium" fuel. In general, US octane ratings are lower than we have so our standard (95) is likely the US premium. So don't start putting Shell Optimax in thinking your engine requires it.

James L
Oct69 RHD 280 in DB906 with cognac leather

dseretakis

  • Guest
Re: lead free fuel
« Reply #3 on: January 31, 2009, 20:56:27 »
94 octane is the highest we can get here in the US.

And as such, will run on whatever you pump. My car has never been "converted" to run lead free and the view is that MB built the valves out of good enough material in the first place not to need harder materials to compensate for the loss of lead.

And if you search on here you'll see stuff about buying "premium" fuel. In general, US octane ratings are lower than we have so our standard (95) is likely the US premium. So don't start putting Shell Optimax in thinking your engine requires it.



Ziggy

  • Guest
Re: lead free fuel
« Reply #4 on: February 01, 2009, 02:16:28 »
US Pagoda's (as well as other exports) have different timing as well as lower compression to compensate for the lower octane. I don't recall exactly from which year from the top off my head, but around 1969
Leaded fuel would be the best, but since this is outlawed just use unleaded without additives which would be bad for your injection pump.
« Last Edit: February 01, 2009, 02:22:12 by Ziggy »

Benz Dr.

  • Associate Member
  • Platinum
  • ******
  • Canada, ON, Port Lambton
  • Posts: 7220
  • Benz Dr.
Re: lead free fuel
« Reply #5 on: February 01, 2009, 04:53:34 »
Late US 280SL's have different engines which also include different valve timing. The compression ratio is the same at 9.5:1 as far as I've ever seen.
1966 230SL 5 speed, LSD, header pipes, 300SE distributor, ported, polished and balanced, AKA  ''The Red Rocket ''
Dan Caron's SL Barn

1970  3.5 Coupe
1961  190SL
1985   300CD  Turbo Coupe
1981  300SD
2013  GMC  Sierra
1965  230SL
1967 250SL
1970 280SL
1988 560SEC

Martijn

  • Full Member
  • Regular
  • **
  • Netherlands, Utrecht, Mijdrecht
  • Posts: 99
Re: lead free fuel
« Reply #6 on: February 01, 2009, 11:37:25 »
I also struggled with the question: what is the best fuel for our cars? If I ask experts, I get different answers. Since leaded fuel isn't available anymore in Holland for many years, the only option is unleaded fuel of course. But which one? Here we can choose between unleaded 95 or 98. But there are also "special" fuels like Shell V-power and BP Ultimate.

One mechanic advised me to use BP Ultimate. This fuel has some cleaning qualities. They claim that this fuel cuts away deposits in the engine, especially in older cars. See http://www.bp.com/genericarticle.do?categoryId=9009378&contentId=7024182.
It sounded reasonable to me and last year I only bought BP Ultimate. My thought was: the extra cost for this fuel is always less than any repair to the engine.
The engine runs great on it. But I can't say that I have now a better engine performance or better mileage, that was not my objective. It's only the preservation of the engine and perhaps it also saves the injection pump.

Another mechanic advised me to use a unleaded fuel additive. I didn't use that so far, but I don't know if I should.

What are your thoughts?

Martijn
Martijn

1967 250 SL - 4-speed manual - dark blue 332

graphic66

  • Guest
Re: lead free fuel
« Reply #7 on: February 01, 2009, 16:26:47 »
All of the W113 cars have hardened valve seats. No need for the lead. Most have high compression pistons though, 9.5-1 or higher. That is what requires higher octane. Higher octane fuel burns cooler and wont preignite. if you don't get preignition with low octane it should be fine. Some low compression motors will have more power with low octane as it burns hotter.

knockmacool

  • Guest
Re: lead free fuel
« Reply #8 on: February 01, 2009, 16:38:50 »
Thanks to all, good to know fuel will only be an expense and not a problem! What mpg should I expect on what the Brits would call "B" roads?


graphic66

  • Guest
Re: lead free fuel
« Reply #9 on: February 01, 2009, 21:23:29 »
I get about 18 MPG with my 230SL. 

ben.king

  • Guest
Re: lead free fuel
« Reply #10 on: February 02, 2009, 08:39:06 »
morning group

aim just restoring my father in laws 1967 250sl and we are both wondering what fuel to use as in the UK we don't have unleaded fuel,will unleaded fuel be OK ?
also once the engine fires into life it will not rev,is this anything to do with the timing ?
kind regards

Ben

dseretakis

  • Guest
Re: lead free fuel
« Reply #11 on: February 02, 2009, 15:39:40 »
113 SLs do not require leaded fuel.  Doesn't matter if its a 230, 250 or 280SL.

morning group

aim just restoring my father in laws 1967 250sl and we are both wondering what fuel to use as in the UK we don't have unleaded fuel,will unleaded fuel be OK ?
also once the engine fires into life it will not rev,is this anything to do with the timing ?
kind regards

Ben

Naj ✝︎

  • Associate Member
  • Platinum
  • ******
  • United Kingdom, Surrey, New Malden
  • Posts: 3163
Re: lead free fuel
« Reply #12 on: February 02, 2009, 17:04:37 »
morning group

aim just restoring my father in laws 1967 250sl
also once the engine fires into life it will not rev,is this anything to do with the timing ?
kind regards

Ben

If it fires up, the timing may be OK.

This thread may help if there is an air lock in the fuel injector pipes:

http://www.sl113.org/forums/index.php?topic=10188.0

naj
68 280SL

JamesL

  • Full Member
  • Platinum
  • ******
  • United Kingdom, London, London
  • Posts: 3610
Re: lead free fuel
« Reply #13 on: February 02, 2009, 21:16:50 »
Knock

I drive mine fairly hard (ask jameshoward) and I get about 21mpg. Imperial, not your poky teeny US version  ;) (4.5l vs 3.87 IIRC)

20.7, to be precise. Mix of A roads and B roads. Very little sitting in traffic
James L
Oct69 RHD 280 in DB906 with cognac leather

knockmacool

  • Guest
Re: lead free fuel
« Reply #14 on: February 04, 2009, 20:41:46 »
Thanks. We'll see if I can match Tosh's 21mpg!

Naj ✝︎

  • Associate Member
  • Platinum
  • ******
  • United Kingdom, Surrey, New Malden
  • Posts: 3163
Re: lead free fuel
« Reply #15 on: February 04, 2009, 20:52:40 »
Knock

I drive mine fairly hard (ask jameshoward) and I get about 21mpg. Imperial, not your poky teeny US version  ;) (4.5l vs 3.87 IIRC)

20.7, to be precise. Mix of A roads and B roads. Very little sitting in traffic

That shud change now with the 3.46  ::)

naj
68 280SL

graphic66

  • Guest
Re: lead free fuel
« Reply #16 on: February 04, 2009, 22:07:46 »
Knock

I drive mine fairly hard (ask jameshoward) and I get about 21mpg. Imperial, not your poky teeny US version  ;) (4.5l vs 3.87 IIRC)

20.7, to be precise. Mix of A roads and B roads. Very little sitting in traffic
  What is an Imperial gallon? I remember them from going to Canada years ago. Is it the same thing? It was always so confusing, especially mixing oil in for my outboard boat motor.

Jonny B

  • Pagoda SL Board
  • Platinum
  • ******
  • USA, CA, San Marcos
  • Posts: 4198
Re: lead free fuel
« Reply #17 on: February 04, 2009, 23:14:47 »
One imperial gallon is 1.2009 us gallons
Jonny B
1967 250 SL Auto, DB 568
1970 280 SL Auto, DB 904
1966 Morris Mini Minor

graphic66

  • Guest
Re: lead free fuel
« Reply #18 on: February 05, 2009, 00:10:24 »
I saw the 21MPG part and thought that was better mileage than I have heard from most, comes out to 17.5MPG US, about normal.