I'd like to expound on this a bit further. One of my pet annoyances is how classic car magazines will review cars that are 40+ years old and make pronouncements about a model of car based on the characteristics of one example.
Thoroughbred & Classic Cars did exactly this when they pronounced the 230 SL gearchange to be "imprecise, wobbly, vague, feeble." (May of '95)
Rubbish! This is clearly a case of one bad apple spoiling it for the others. Anyone who has driven a Pagoda with a decent gearbox will confirm this.
In fact, my understanding is that a 230 SL with a manual gearbox can be one of the very best-driving Pagodas.
It's fair to say that after 40+ years of "selective" maintenance, any car will end up reflecting the characteristics of its owners as well as its engineers.
Douglas Kim
New York, NY
280 SL #018260