Author Topic: 230sl rear brakes (thickness)  (Read 2494 times)

jpmbca

  • Guest
230sl rear brakes (thickness)
« on: March 16, 2016, 03:48:49 »
Hello:
I'm hoping one of the members can shed some light on some rear brake questions:
1. What is the minimum thickness for the rear shoes? Is it 1.5mm
2. I've been reading about re-lining the shoes.  If I go this route, can someone confirm how thick the "max" is?  (i.e. what would the thickness of the shoes be when new?)

Many thanks.

vande17941

  • Full Member
  • Senior
  • ***
  • USA, CA, Irvine
  • Posts: 198
Re: 230sl rear brakes (thickness)
« Reply #1 on: March 16, 2016, 13:21:42 »
I think the minimum friction material thickness should be very conservative, especially in the event the brake shoes could possibly be original. I have had shoes completely separate from their friction material damaging the hyper expensive drums . If it looks like they're getting low at all, just get them relined to be safe. The risk isn't worth it. Especially when one of the shoes friction material comes loose and gems inside the drum... All hell breaks loose.
'66 USA (1967 model Year) 230sl, 4-speed Manual, Driven Like a Real Car! Set up with KYB Stiffer Shocks, and Motor Mounts w Urethane Inserts Underneath, 3-point Belts, Headrests Installed 🚗

1986 560sl Cabernet & Palomino (not recommended)

2001 SLK320 Sport AMG Silver & Black

Benz Dr.

  • Associate Member
  • Platinum
  • ******
  • Canada, ON, Port Lambton
  • Posts: 7220
  • Benz Dr.
Re: 230sl rear brakes (thickness)
« Reply #2 on: March 16, 2016, 21:39:16 »
I think front pads are about 3 - 4 mm minimum so I imagine rear shoes would be in that same range.
1966 230SL 5 speed, LSD, header pipes, 300SE distributor, ported, polished and balanced, AKA  ''The Red Rocket ''
Dan Caron's SL Barn

1970  3.5 Coupe
1961  190SL
1985   300CD  Turbo Coupe
1981  300SD
2013  GMC  Sierra
1965  230SL
1967 250SL
1970 280SL
1988 560SEC