Author Topic: Consumer Reports 2023 least reliable Brand Mercedes  (Read 5573 times)

zoegrlh

  • Full Member
  • Gold
  • *****
  • USA, VA, Williamsburg
  • Posts: 808
  • Beauty from top BCW
Re: Consumer Reports 2023 least reliable Brand Mercedes
« Reply #25 on: December 30, 2022, 00:36:00 »
Bottom line to this subject is that we Pagoda owners are a lucky bunch because our SLs were manufactured in the days where DB took extra scrutiny in building their cars. And yes no computers on board.
Robert Hyatt
Williamsburg, VA.

W113, 1970 280SL, Red leather 242 on Silver Gray Met. 180, 4-speed stick, Euro spec, restored
R172 2012 SLK350, Black Premium leather 801 on Mars Red 590, 7-speed auto
W211, 2007 E320 Bluetec, Cashmere MB Tex 144 on Arctic White 650, 7 speed auto

MikeSimon

  • Full Member
  • Platinum
  • ******
  • USA, OH, North Royalton
  • Posts: 2477
Re: Consumer Reports 2023 least reliable Brand Mercedes
« Reply #26 on: December 30, 2022, 13:12:40 »

Orange peel all over the paint. 

Exactly! Terrible. Like an "Earl Scheib" paint job
1970/71 280SL Automatic
Sandy Beige
Parchment Leather
Power Steering
Automatic
Hardtop
Heated Tinted Rear Window
German specs
3rd owner

Pinder

  • Full Member
  • Platinum
  • ******
  • USA, NJ, Edison
  • Posts: 1031
Re: Consumer Reports 2023 least reliable Brand Mercedes
« Reply #27 on: February 16, 2023, 00:09:04 »
450 GLS update.   So still less than 10K miles on it. Now the Navigation system no longer starts up and is throwing erors whilst driving (basically) not working and distracting the driver. And the Traffic signal inoperative warning keeps popping up. This time I will have my wife take it in to the dealership. Tired of wasting hours on this. Can't wait for the lease to end on this one. will not recommend anyone get one of these. 
1970 280 SL Light Ivory DB 670. 4 Speed manual shift no AC Limited Slip Diff.
1997 Corvette C5 Silver. automatic
2015 BMW 320i xdrive
2021 Mercedes GLS450 Silver

johnk

  • Full Member
  • Platinum
  • ******
  • USA, OH, Avon
  • Posts: 1166
Re: Consumer Reports 2023 least reliable Brand Mercedes
« Reply #28 on: February 16, 2023, 03:06:32 »
I have 10k on my 2022 gls 450 and no problems yet other than a weak signal pick up from the keys. I hope to get that addresses when I take it in for the 10k service soon.
« Last Edit: February 16, 2023, 11:54:13 by johnk »
John Krystowski
Avon Ohio
1968 Euro 280sl under restoration
2016 Jag F-Type R sold june 2021
1950 Alfa Romeo 6C 2500 SS For sale
2008 E350
2007 GL 450
2019 BMW 540

DaveB

  • Full Member
  • Gold
  • *****
  • Australia, Western Australia, Lathlain
  • Posts: 953
Re: Consumer Reports 2023 least reliable Brand Mercedes
« Reply #29 on: February 16, 2023, 03:42:55 »
This time I will have my wife take it in to the dealership. Tired of wasting hours on this.
:D :-\
DaveB
'65 US 230sl 4-speed, DB190

ejboyd5

  • Associate Member
  • Gold
  • *****
  • Southold, NY
  • Posts: 510
Re: Consumer Reports 2023 least reliable Brand Mercedes
« Reply #30 on: February 16, 2023, 12:58:40 »
My newest M-B is an '85.  I don't see that changing. It's interesting that my other 5 M-B cars ranging from '55 to '72 start and run perfectly with very little maintenance required.  Mercedes has abandoned it's traditional strengths and is coasting on "empty."

PeterW113

  • Full Member
  • Senior
  • ***
  • United Kingdom, England, London
  • Posts: 160
Re: Consumer Reports 2023 least reliable Brand Mercedes
« Reply #31 on: February 16, 2023, 23:32:05 »
I also have an ML and a SL55. One has been wonderful and one has been a very expensive mistake, despite its wonderful engine.

Ignoring this predicament, what I find really inexcusable about current Mercedes cars is styling.

Mercedes styling used to be elegant, now it’s AGGRESSIVE.

Perhaps because I am of a certain age, I do not like aggressive styling.
Peter
1968 MB 280SL, RHD Auto
1968 Lotus Elan +2
1965 Fiat 500
2004 BMW 1200 GS

John Betsch - "SADIE"

  • Pagoda SL Board
  • Silver
  • ****
  • USA, NY, SOUTHOLD
  • Posts: 403
Re: Consumer Reports 2023 least reliable Brand Mercedes
« Reply #32 on: February 16, 2023, 23:57:54 »
This has been an interesting post and interaction.  Joe Alexander is spot on with "The amount of problems increases with complexity."  However why is it that companies like BMW are not on the list?

 I believe that Mercedes is targeting a different market judging by its "intended to the younger market" styling and included innovations and  trying to adapt to the new market make-up.  Good idea? Not sure

Gimmick innovation and ideas seem to be the new norm

jb

JB; 1965 German market SL, Rot Met 571, Summary Code 213 Interior

rwmastel

  • Full Member
  • Platinum
  • ******
  • USA, OH, Canal Winchester
  • Posts: 4634
  • Pagoda SL Group: 20+ years and going strong!
Re: Consumer Reports 2023 least reliable Brand Mercedes
« Reply #33 on: February 17, 2023, 00:53:35 »
Gimmick innovation and ideas seem to be the new norm
It's the new definition of luxury and prestige.

These days, a car is special and highly valued because of what the electrical engineers are doing.  And yes, some manufacturers seem to be managing complexity better than others.  I just got a 2017 C43 in May, and my wife got a 2022 Volvo XC60 in late 2021.  We'll see how those get along over the years.
Rodd

Did you search the forum before asking?
2017 C43 AMG
2006 Wrangler Rubicon
1966 230SL auto "Italian"

bracurrie

  • Full Member
  • Senior
  • ***
  • USA, TN, Nashville
  • Posts: 110
  • The SL to have is a 113, but I don't have one.
Re: Consumer Reports 2023 least reliable Brand Mercedes
« Reply #34 on: February 20, 2023, 13:06:19 »
The car business in this era of complexity and supply chain challenges is hard getting harder. Competition from Korea is the vector that I'll bet keeps the Board of Mercedes Benz up at night.
The cars that defined the Mercedes Benz brand came from the generation that came out of WW II. The Daimler Benz board allowed, somewhat reluctantly, those product development engineers to create a product that was ahead of its time. The innovations of the 1960's were state of the art for 20 years and had allowed the company to absorb the forced changes from emissions, safety and recycling regulations while retaining its stature and expanding the business. Then because the game changed with digital technology and brutal competition Mercedes Benz no longer had an advantage. The company is very large now and isn't meeting the challenge of making a superior product that people want while making a profit.   
1970 280 SE W108.018
M130.980 w/ US emissions
manual column shift

Pinder

  • Full Member
  • Platinum
  • ******
  • USA, NJ, Edison
  • Posts: 1031
Re: Consumer Reports 2023 least reliable Brand Mercedes
« Reply #35 on: February 21, 2023, 00:39:36 »
What's most disturbing about new cars in general is that software updates can disable your car or make working things like navigation stop working with an automatic update. Having your car be totally unable to start or  possibly stop while driving is just not a good way to go. Not to mention the fact you can be tracked where every you  are.  No little lies to tell when you make a detour. Completely taken the joys out of life.
1970 280 SL Light Ivory DB 670. 4 Speed manual shift no AC Limited Slip Diff.
1997 Corvette C5 Silver. automatic
2015 BMW 320i xdrive
2021 Mercedes GLS450 Silver

Cees Klumper

  • Full Member
  • Platinum
  • ******
  • USA, CA, Fallbrook
  • Posts: 5719
    • http://SL113.org
Re: Consumer Reports 2023 least reliable Brand Mercedes
« Reply #36 on: February 21, 2023, 04:18:39 »
That's why the last thing I would want is for my 2013 GLK to be connected to the mothership - when I bought it a few months ago the subscription to the internet-or-whatever-based link had expired and that's exactly how it's going to stay. And the car will never see a Mercedes dealership if at all possible.
Cees Klumper
1969 Mercedes 280 SL automatic
1968 Ford Mustang 302 V8
1961 Alfa Romeo Giulietta Sprint Coupe 1600
1962 FIAT 1500S OSCA convertible
1972 Lancia Fulvia Coupe 1.3
1983 Porsche 944 2.5
1990 Ford Bronco II