Author Topic: Parts cleaners (solvent tank v. ultrasonic tank)  (Read 3880 times)

rwmastel

  • Full Member
  • Platinum
  • ******
  • USA, OH, Canal Winchester
  • Posts: 4653
  • Pagoda SL Group: 20+ years and going strong!
Parts cleaners (solvent tank v. ultrasonic tank)
« on: October 10, 2023, 18:30:19 »
I'm looking at getting a tool to clean parts.  An age old tool in auto shops is the solvent tank, often includes a pressure nozzle and cleaning brush.  In recent years, hobbyists like us have been using ultrasonic tanks to clean small parts.  Does the ultrasonic tank replace the need for the solvent tank?  Should the hobbyist have both?  Solvent tanks are larger for less money.  What size and brand of ultrasonic units to you guys have?  I'm thinking 10 liter or 2.5 gallon would be minimum for our hobby, no?

Also, when the solvent needs refreshed in the old fashioned solvent tank, I assume you need to take the stuff to a hazardous waste disposal site.  Right?  How is the used water/cleaner solution in ultrasound cleaners disposed of?
Rodd

Did you search the forum before asking?
2017 C43 AMG
2006 Wrangler Rubicon
1966 230SL auto "Italian"

Cees Klumper

  • Full Member
  • Platinum
  • ******
  • USA, CA, Fallbrook
  • Posts: 5747
    • http://SL113.org
Re: Parts cleaners (solvent tank v. ultrasonic tank)
« Reply #1 on: October 10, 2023, 23:40:53 »
Hey Rodd, it depends on what parts you're looking to clean. I have used an ultrasonic cleaner only on my carburetor parts. Engine greasy parts: brush and plenty of kerosene. Chassis/steel parts: sandblaster or wire wheel on angle grinder.
Cees Klumper
1969 Mercedes 280 SL automatic
1968 Ford Mustang 302 V8
1961 Alfa Romeo Giulietta Sprint Coupe 1600
1962 FIAT 1500S OSCA convertible
1972 Lancia Fulvia Coupe 1.3
1983 Porsche 944 2.5
1990 Ford Bronco II

Vander

  • Full Member
  • Silver
  • ****
  • USA, OH, Columbus
  • Posts: 395
Re: Parts cleaners (solvent tank v. ultrasonic tank)
« Reply #2 on: October 11, 2023, 00:14:35 »
Most kitchens these days have an automatic parts washer built-in, they even pump out the waste.
1969 280SL

Mike Hughes

  • Full Member
  • Platinum
  • ******
  • USA, VA, Blue Grass
  • Posts: 1759
Re: Parts cleaners (solvent tank v. ultrasonic tank)
« Reply #3 on: October 11, 2023, 00:27:01 »
She who must be obeyed would put a contract out on me if I did that!  ;^)
- Mike Hughes  -ô¿ô-
  1966 230SL Auto P/S
  Havana Brown (408)
  Light Beige (181)
  Cream M-B Tex (121)

dirkbalter

  • Full Member
  • Platinum
  • ******
  • USA, CA, Corona
  • Posts: 1485
Re: Parts cleaners (solvent tank v. ultrasonic tank)
« Reply #4 on: October 11, 2023, 00:32:14 »
Most kitchens these days have an automatic parts washer built-in, they even pump out the waste.

Love it. lol.
Dirk
66 230 SL
70 280 SEL
53 CHEVY 3100
18 C300 COUPE
05 HD FLSTNI

rwmastel

  • Full Member
  • Platinum
  • ******
  • USA, OH, Canal Winchester
  • Posts: 4653
  • Pagoda SL Group: 20+ years and going strong!
Re: Parts cleaners (solvent tank v. ultrasonic tank)
« Reply #5 on: October 11, 2023, 04:52:48 »
Hey Rodd, it depends on what parts you're looking to clean. I have used an ultrasonic cleaner only on my carburetor parts. Engine greasy parts: brush and plenty of kerosene. Chassis/steel parts: sandblaster or wire wheel on angle grinder.
Well, if I ever get to it, I want to really clean up the engine bay hardware while the engine is out.  So, that's probably a solvent tank.  Rebuilding the electric fuel pump is on my list, I think the ultrasonic tank would get those parts (housing, etc.) clean.  Fuel injectors and cold start valve would be good candidates for ultrasonic cleaning.  Who knows what else I might do.

She who must be obeyed would put a contract out on me if I did that!  ;^)
Yes, the kitchen is not an option.  Also, we're on well and septic, so what I put in the ground may come back in my drinking water some day!  That thinking (regardless of accuracy) keeps me from polluting.
« Last Edit: October 12, 2023, 14:51:22 by rwmastel »
Rodd

Did you search the forum before asking?
2017 C43 AMG
2006 Wrangler Rubicon
1966 230SL auto "Italian"

mdsalemi

  • Pagoda SL Board
  • Platinum
  • ******
  • USA, NC, Davidson
  • Posts: 7104
Re: Parts cleaners (solvent tank v. ultrasonic tank)
« Reply #6 on: October 16, 2023, 14:41:29 »
Obviously there's no one way to clean everything.

I have a small-ish ultrasonic cleaner I bought when I owned a car wash, I used it to clean a variety of small parts including nozzles. I used water-based degreasing solvents. ZEP purple is one, and you can get something similar at Sam's Club, also purple. I also used various detergents etc. depending on what was being cleaned. The unit holds maybe 24 ounces or so, and has heat. Not as big as some, but much larger than a jewelry cleaner.

I used to do a lot of degreasing for bicycle work using a tried and true old coffee can and mineral spirits. As soon as you would put in a greasy dirty object, you'd see the grease being dissolved by the mineral spirits. However in recent years with the advent of low-VOC mineral spirits, these new mineral spirits are pretty useless; I've soaked some greasy nuts and bolts for days and nothing happens! The water based purple degreasers do a better job and quicker.

Spray cans of both Carburetor and or Brake Cleaner do a good job on installed parts. I suspect that some of these volatile organic solvents are available in bulk but you then have the disposal issue you note, and I guess they are not cheap either.

I also have a vibratory tumbler. Also not too big but big enough for all kinds of small parts such as nuts and bolts and similar. After cleaning, some days in the tumbler yield a nice clean part with the right media.
Michael Salemi
Davidson, North Carolina (Charlotte Area) USA
1969 280SL (USA-Spec)
Signal Red 568G w/Black Leather (Restored)
2023 Ford Maverick Lariat Hybrid "Area 51"
2023 Ford Escape Hybrid
2024 Ford Mustang Mach Ex PEV

Fandorin

  • Junior Level
  • USA, IL, Chicago
  • Posts: 2
Re: Parts cleaners (solvent tank v. ultrasonic tank)
« Reply #7 on: January 17, 2025, 13:22:23 »
I’ve been using an ultrasonic cleaner for a while now, and it’s been a game-changer for smaller parts. It doesn't completely replace a solvent tank though. For larger or tougher cleaning jobs, the solvent tank still has its place, especially if you’re cleaning bigger parts or need a heavier-duty solution. I’ve got a 10-liter ultrasonic unit, and it works well for my hobby needs.

I think that size is about right, but I’d go a bit larger if you’re planning on cleaning multiple parts at once. As for disposal, the water in ultrasonic cleaners can be tricky. I usually just dilute and dispose of it carefully, but I’ve read that certain cleaners have safer disposal methods. A few months ago, I needed a cleaner for a tricky part and found a reliable model here: https://www.kaijo-shibuya.com/industrial-ultrasonic-cleaners/, which helped a lot with efficiency.
« Last Edit: Today at 14:12:45 by Fandorin »

Pawel66

  • Full Member
  • Platinum
  • ******
  • Poland, Mazowieckie, Konstancin-Jeziorna
  • Posts: 5552
Re: Parts cleaners (solvent tank v. ultrasonic tank)
« Reply #8 on: January 17, 2025, 13:42:26 »
The restoration industry here use three methods: sand blasting, glass blasting and ice blasting.
Pawel

280SL 1970 automatic 180G Silver
W128 220SE
W121 190SL
G-class

johnk

  • Full Member
  • Platinum
  • ******
  • USA, OH, Avon
  • Posts: 1170
Re: Parts cleaners (solvent tank v. ultrasonic tank)
« Reply #9 on: January 18, 2025, 04:10:58 »
I used Harbor freight parts cleaner with the Zep Purple cleaner. Added a cattle trough heater from Tractor supply and overnight not only would the parts be clean, but the paint would be removed from the many parts not primered before painting at the factory. Made it real easy to paint or powder coat the parts to look like new.
John Krystowski
Avon Ohio
1968 Euro 280sl under restoration
2016 Jag F-Type R sold june 2021
1950 Alfa Romeo 6C 2500 SS For sale
2008 E350
2007 GL 450
2019 BMW 540

stickandrudderman

  • Vendor
  • Platinum
  • ******
  • United Kingdom, England, Richmond
  • Posts: 2948
    • http://www.colinferns.com
Re: Parts cleaners (solvent tank v. ultrasonic tank)
« Reply #10 on: January 18, 2025, 09:39:58 »
I'm afraid there is no "one size fits all".
I use
ultrasonic
Heated parts washer
Vapour blasting
Mechanical (using special tools)

wwheeler

  • Vendor
  • Platinum
  • ******
  • USA, TX, Dallas
  • Posts: 2911
Re: Parts cleaners (solvent tank v. ultrasonic tank)
« Reply #11 on: January 18, 2025, 16:46:46 »
Zep purple with a heated ultrasonic cleaner is my first step for greasy parts. Then I hit them with a glass bead blaster. Note: Zep purple reacts with Aluminum parts! You have to be careful how long they stay in there. In theory, it could eat the aluminum until nothing is left.

For painted parts, I use "Strip-it-dry" paint remover. One of the few that REALLY work. Others have had the good stuff removed and are basically useless.   

But there is no silver bullet. What you use depends on the part design, its material make up and if its greasy or just just dirty.
Wallace
Texas
'68 280SE W111 coupe
'60 220SE W128 coupe
'70 Plymouth Roadrunner 440+6