Just for the heck of it I took my 280 SL to the local clean air testing station and had it run on the test dyno. The results were shown in units that I don't recall right now, in a graphical form. I really hoped the results would be in CO percent, but no such luck.
At any rate, one thing was very clear from the graph: when the throttle is shut and the car is coasting in gear, the mixture goes very rich until it gets back to idle. I was really puzzled by that at first, but near as I can figure, it happens because the engine is still revving above idle rpm, thus causing the injection pump flyweights to swing out and move the internal linkage in the "more fuel" direction. Meanwhile the throttle is closed and restricting the amount of air available for good combustion. This phenomenon explains the fuel cut solenoid used on the later US models, it eliminates this rich condition (and all those emissions) by shutting off the fuel until rpms are close to idle speed again.
And last but not least, this overrich condition on coast-down probably accounts for at least part of the lovely smell some of us experience. I wouldn't expect the fuel to make much difference, but driving into the wind all the time should help
. Oh yeah, the test station had to compare the car to something, so they used the oldest standard they had available, the 1974 emissions standards. We failed, but I think with a fuel cut solenoid we might have passed.
George Davis
'69 280 SL Euro manual