I just bought some brake fluid a couple weeks ago and was going to put it in this weekend. I may return it and get regular DOT 3. I bought Valvoline SynPower Brake Fluid. It describes itself as:
"SynPower ABS synthetic DOT 3 & DOT 4 motor vehicle brake fluid recommended for anti-lock braking systems, hydraulic drum and disc braking systems and hydraulic clutches requiring DOT 3 & DOT 4 fluids. It's premium, synthetic, low moisture formulation provides superior anti-vapor lock protection. Has a high dry-boiling point up to 502F that reduces the risk of fluid vaporization and possible brake failure. Meets and exceeds specifications SAE J1703, FMVSS No. 116 and DOT 4 Motor Vehicle Brake Fluid. Surpasses Federal Motor Vehicle DOT 4 requirements. Mixes with conventional brake fluids. Minimum wet boiling point of 343F.”
What do you have to say about synthetic brake fluid? I would like to hear more opinions and experiences. Here's what our Technical Articles say about brake fluid:
http://www.sl113.org/articles/brakes/brakes.asp
I am interested in silicon brake fluid since I am replacing all the lines, etc. during the restoration. Is silicon fluid an improvement over DOT 4 or 5? Or is the main advantage longevity of the fluid?
I struggled with this when I restored my brake system. My restoration shop advised against it, believing that my reconditioned brake booster and rubber components exposed to the synthetic fluid (silicon?) would not hold up and I would have problems. Any long-term users of synthetic fluid for brakes?
I use silicone fluid (DOT-5) because the brakes on my car faded when coming down an Alpine pass on its maiden voyage, then again a year later in an MBCA time trials. Therefore I consider it a handling enhancement.
I have had both good and bad luck with synthetic brake fluid. I used it in a 190 SL and my 280 SL. Both did just fine. I used it because it was the in-thing to do. Both cars had new brake systems. The only used part on the 280 SL was the proportioning valve by the gas tank. I have also tried the synthetic on a customer's 190 SL and had the fluid pour right out of new wheel cylinders. What a mess. Changed the wheel cylinders and it happened again. Perhaps it was the fluid. I was told only Dow and GE make the stuff. The only reason to use synthetic that I can see is it will not mess up your paint. Otherwise, the brake system still collects contaminants such as moisture, dirt, and old rubber. Which means you have to bleed the system every few years to get clean fluid in there. I think there is less possibility of rubber flex hoses swelling up internally. That would be a plus for synthetic. The higher boiling point is not a factor unless you race your car. I did get a slightly spongy pedal with the synthetic, but I got used to it.
I have been using silicone Brake Fluid (I.E.: DOT 5) for probably 20 years. I've only had a problem on one car, 70 Barracuda Convertible, that I just flushed the system and the Wheel seals leaked. This is because it does not swell the wheel seals. After installing new wheel cylinders it worked fine. You've overlooked one main advantage. Silicone Brake Fluid is hydrophobic, it does NOT absorb water (I see no need for annual flushing.) Standard DOT 3 brake fluid absorbs water from the atmosphere, breathing from the Master Cylinder lid. This is why the DOT 3 containers all state that it must be kept sealed. In my experience the main cause of failure of wheel cylinders on shoe brakes is the corrosion at the bottom of the cylinder from water droplets. I admit that disc brakes run at a higher temperature and are not as subject to this (my '67 230 SL still has shoe brakes on the back). But, although it will mix with DOT 3, there's no advantage unless you're rebuilding the system and everything is clean, without moisture. Silicone will not take the water out of an old system.
Rodd
Powell, Ohio, USA
1966 230SL, Euro, Auto, Leather, both tops
1994 E420