« previous next »
Pages: [1]

Author Topic: Whose rack is better?  (Read 9246 times)

Dave

  • Guest
Whose rack is better?
« on: June 14, 2011, 18:47:40 »
Talking hardtop storage here -
I see Millers Benz and Bud's Benz.  Metal rack with casters and dust cover.  Same price $149.  Does anyone have experiece with either one?
Thanks!
Logged

StlCardFan

  • Guest
Re: Whose rack is better?
« Reply #1 on: June 14, 2011, 23:04:30 »
As I nervously clicked on your post from a work computer, I was pleased that the topic covered what I expected.   ;)

I just ordered one from Adsit and received it this week.  It was $149 and came with a cover.  When I pulled it out the box I didn't think it would be hefty enough, but was pleasantly surprised once I put it together as it was really solid.

Geoff
Logged

Dave

  • Guest
Re: Whose rack is better?
« Reply #2 on: June 15, 2011, 01:53:41 »
Thanks Geoff
I never heard of that vendor, and I will give them a look.
Logged

Benz Dr.

  • Associate Member
  • Platinum
  • ******
  • Canada, ON, Port Lambton
  • Posts: 7220
  • Benz Dr.
Re: Whose rack is better?
« Reply #3 on: June 15, 2011, 03:19:56 »
Quote from: StlCardFan on June 14, 2011, 23:04:30
As I nervously clicked on your post from a work computer, I was pleased that the topic covered what I expected.   ;)

I just ordered one from Adsit and received it this week.  It was $149 and came with a cover.  When I pulled it out the box I didn't think it would be hefty enough, but was pleasantly surprised once I put it together as it was really solid.

Geoff

 ( I vote for Pam Anderson :o - wait a second...... she broke hers a while ago... :-\ forget it )

  Intersting.......

 A while back someone else bought a top hoist from the same company ( ADSIT) and thought they should be sleeping with the fishes for the dangerous crap they sell  because of missing parts and placing everyones lives in mortal danger.

Yup. Real interesting....... :)


Logged
1966 230SL 5 speed, LSD, header pipes, 300SE distributor, ported, polished and balanced, AKA  ''The Red Rocket ''
Dan Caron's SL Barn

1970  3.5 Coupe
1961  190SL
1985   300CD  Turbo Coupe
1981  300SD
2013  GMC  Sierra
1965  230SL
1967 250SL
1970 280SL
1988 560SEC

Garry

  • Full Member
  • Platinum
  • ******
  • Australia, Victoria, Kyneton and Brisbane Queensland
  • Posts: 5236
  • Audit Committee
Re: Whose rack is better?
« Reply #4 on: June 15, 2011, 04:01:39 »
I got one from Millers and it works just fine.
Garry
Logged
Garry Marks
Melbourne/ Kyneton, Brisbane. Australia
1969 MB 280SL 5 speed RHD SOLD.
1965 MB 230SL Auto RHD Lt Blue 334G, Top 350H, Tourist Delivery.
1972 MB 280CE Auto RHD 906G
2005 MB A200
2006 MB B200
2019 Izuzu DMax 4x4 Slide-on camper.
2022 Volvo XC40 Electric
2024 Volvo EX30 Electric

bootes

  • Guest
Re: Whose rack is better?
« Reply #5 on: June 15, 2011, 04:35:13 »
I bought a folding one from Performance Products in FL recently and it was a piece of junk. I returned it and bought a non-folding one from rockauto.com per 49er's (John in CA) recommendation. It is very solid and heavy duty... and much cheaper $89 plus about $20 for shipping. It appears as though you have to order a dust cover separately per website and company rep (which I did) however a dustcover is included in the storage cart box for the $89.

http://www.rockauto.com/catalog/x,carcode,1193486,parttype,15040
Logged

49er

  • Full Member
  • Platinum
  • ******
  • USA, CA, El Dorado Hills
  • Posts: 1426
Re: Whose rack is better?
« Reply #6 on: June 15, 2011, 13:29:04 »
Quote from: Bootes on June 15, 2011, 04:35:13
I bought a folding one from Performance Products in FL recently and it was a piece of junk. I returned it and bought a non-folding one from rockauto.com per 49er's (John in CA) recommendation. It is very solid and heavy duty... and much cheaper $89 plus about $20 for shipping. It appears as though you have to order a dust cover separately per website and company rep (which I did) however a dustcover is included in the storage cart box for the $89.

http://www.rockauto.com/catalog/x,carcode,1193486,parttype,15040

 Couldn't be more happier with this rack from RockAuto. $89 +shipping (and it did include the cover). Glad it worked out for you Rick.

John

« Last Edit: June 15, 2011, 13:33:07 by 49er »
Logged
1969 280SL 003820
Un Restored, All Original, including the paint
Original Owner, Purchased September 18, 1968
4 speed manual, PS. 77217 miles
7280 miles since awoken from her 20+ yr "nap" in 2010

Witt

  • Guest
Re: Whose rack is better?
« Reply #7 on: June 15, 2011, 18:27:45 »
.........I still prefere my own home made electric hoist suspending the top SAFELY from the garage ceiling out of harms way.....featured at an earlier post.....

CHEERS !
WITT !
Logged

Benz Dr.

  • Associate Member
  • Platinum
  • ******
  • Canada, ON, Port Lambton
  • Posts: 7220
  • Benz Dr.
Re: Whose rack is better?
« Reply #8 on: June 15, 2011, 21:21:39 »
Say.....Witt?  Didin't Pam live just down the street from you at one time?  She is from BC as I recall.

  Would you be vailable to look at a car for me in your area?
Logged
1966 230SL 5 speed, LSD, header pipes, 300SE distributor, ported, polished and balanced, AKA  ''The Red Rocket ''
Dan Caron's SL Barn

1970  3.5 Coupe
1961  190SL
1985   300CD  Turbo Coupe
1981  300SD
2013  GMC  Sierra
1965  230SL
1967 250SL
1970 280SL
1988 560SEC

Witt

  • Guest
Re: Whose rack is better?
« Reply #9 on: June 17, 2011, 02:55:34 »
.....now let me get this straight, you want me to look at a car for you, which I gladly do, or you want me to look up at Pam which I also gladly do but may be much more difficult !?

CHEERS !
WITT !
Logged

JamesL

  • Full Member
  • Platinum
  • ******
  • United Kingdom, London, London
  • Posts: 3610
Re: Whose rack is better?
« Reply #10 on: June 17, 2011, 12:12:02 »
Sure fire way to tell the difference: No airbags on a Pagoda
Logged
James L
Oct69 RHD 280 in DB906 with cognac leather

Rolland

  • Guest
Re: Whose rack is better?
« Reply #11 on: June 17, 2011, 17:28:52 »
I've had good experiences with Admit, even on an issue with a headlight assembly for my E320 when the shipped a pair that didn't match. The were to both be Bosch but one wasn't. The change a few months later baas smooth as silk.

Rolland
Logged

Benz Dr.

  • Associate Member
  • Platinum
  • ******
  • Canada, ON, Port Lambton
  • Posts: 7220
  • Benz Dr.
Re: Whose rack is better?
« Reply #12 on: June 18, 2011, 04:56:34 »
Quote from: Witt on June 17, 2011, 02:55:34
.....now let me get this straight, you want me to look at a car for you, which I gladly do, or you want me to look up at Pam which I also gladly do but may be much more difficult !?

CHEERS !
WITT !

  We'll forget bout Pam for now. I have a 220SEb Cab. I'd like you to look at. Better looking and at least the head lghts are real. 
Logged
1966 230SL 5 speed, LSD, header pipes, 300SE distributor, ported, polished and balanced, AKA  ''The Red Rocket ''
Dan Caron's SL Barn

1970  3.5 Coupe
1961  190SL
1985   300CD  Turbo Coupe
1981  300SD
2013  GMC  Sierra
1965  230SL
1967 250SL
1970 280SL
1988 560SEC

Dave

  • Guest
Re: Whose rack is better?
« Reply #13 on: June 19, 2011, 00:49:43 »
Ok, so I learned of a new supplier, placed an order, saved some money, and guys all over the planet got a chuckle.  That's what i call a successful post.
Thanks to a great community and for a great Forum.
Logged

Witt

  • Guest
Re: Whose rack is better?
« Reply #14 on: June 21, 2011, 19:50:33 »
Dan, I am going to be at the ALL GERMAN CAR MEET in North Vancouver on Sunday June 26.
If the car that you want me to look at is mobile why not ask the owner to be there between 11am and 3pm
Feel free to give him my email address  or phone number, which you should have, so he can contact me ?

CHEERS !
WITT !
Logged
Pages: [1]
« previous next »