Author Topic: Should my Automatic start in 1st or 2nd?  (Read 2837 times)

StickleyStyle

  • Guest
Should my Automatic start in 1st or 2nd?
« on: January 10, 2013, 20:15:15 »
I have a 65 230SL that I’m just now getting back on the road after about a 12 year “nap”. One of the things that never impressed me about the car ever since I have had it was its sluggish acceleration from a dead stop due to the fact it starts out in second gear. It always gave me an uneasy feeling when I needed to move out of the way quickly as the car would not, unless I pulled the selector (oh, I guess I should mention we are talking an automatic) down to the 2nd position. In this position the car scooted just fine. I just thought maybe this is how it was designed and never gave any additional thought to it. Well, after joining this SL group and having access to all this fine information from so many knowledgeable folks I discovered that there seems to be some variation in transmission designs where some start in first and others start in second. So my question is: how do I know if I have a malfunctioning transmission or not. Without pulling the selector to the "2" position, what gear should it start from? Am I missing something here?

Thank you all in advance for any information.

Phil

Neil Thompson

  • Associate Member
  • Silver
  • ****
  • United Kingdom, England, Louth
  • Posts: 383
Re: Should my Automatic start in 1st or 2nd?
« Reply #1 on: January 10, 2013, 21:29:49 »
Phil I believe if in drive the car sets off in second gear as yours does

Neil
1964 230 SL RHD DB304 Horizon Blue
1957 190 SL RHD DB180 Silver
1988 R107 300 SL RHD DB199 Blue Black
1978 C123 230C 2dr Auto RHD Silver

Cees Klumper

  • Full Member
  • Platinum
  • ******
  • USA, CA, Fallbrook
  • Posts: 5719
    • http://SL113.org
Re: Should my Automatic start in 1st or 2nd?
« Reply #2 on: January 10, 2013, 21:55:45 »
I'm pretty sure all automatics start off in 2nd in 'D' unless, as you describe, you put the selector in '2' (or floor it so kickdown engages, but not sure about that). Bottom line I think your car's trans works as intended, and you may want to check other possible causes for the sluggishness.
Cees Klumper
1969 Mercedes 280 SL automatic
1968 Ford Mustang 302 V8
1961 Alfa Romeo Giulietta Sprint Coupe 1600
1962 FIAT 1500S OSCA convertible
1972 Lancia Fulvia Coupe 1.3
1983 Porsche 944 2.5
1990 Ford Bronco II

Benz Dr.

  • Associate Member
  • Platinum
  • ******
  • Canada, ON, Port Lambton
  • Posts: 7220
  • Benz Dr.
Re: Should my Automatic start in 1st or 2nd?
« Reply #3 on: January 11, 2013, 00:52:15 »
They all start in second to prevent wheel spin in less than nominal conditions.
I would look at the kick down linkage. We found that it needs to be moving freely or it will affect how well the car moves from a stop.

At idle and in gear, the rod should move to the rear. As soon as you touch the gas pedal it should move forward slightly and it should move forward all the way when you hit the kick down switch. I've seen the bushing inside of the kick down switch ( KDS ) sieze up enough that it wouldn't move, or just enough that it wouldn't move all the way. The linkage running from the KDS to the modulator valve can also sieze at the hiem joints.
 
Not only does the shaft have to move fully forward during kick down but it also has to move all the way to the rear when there is no pressure on the throttle linkage. This helps to soften down shifts. If the linkage is stuck in the rear position your car will be slow. Of course, it may be slow for some other reason.
1966 230SL 5 speed, LSD, header pipes, 300SE distributor, ported, polished and balanced, AKA  ''The Red Rocket ''
Dan Caron's SL Barn

1970  3.5 Coupe
1961  190SL
1985   300CD  Turbo Coupe
1981  300SD
2013  GMC  Sierra
1965  230SL
1967 250SL
1970 280SL
1988 560SEC