Author Topic: 1966 230SL Rear Suspension  (Read 4145 times)

Harry

  • Full Member
  • Gold
  • *****
  • USA, TN, Knoxville
  • Posts: 732
1966 230SL Rear Suspension
« on: December 17, 2015, 01:42:43 »
So just curious, if I wanted to freshen up the rear suspension on this car what parts should be candidate?  I have replaced the center bushing that mounts to the cross member in the trunk.  What about trailing arms bushings/rubber?  Shock absorbers?  And what is the experience in terms of results and improvement in ride, etc.

The car actually seems to be OK except there is a rattle sometime on the left rear over bumps.  Not severe, just there.
Harry Bailey
Knoxville, TN
1966 230SL
Automatic

jameshoward

  • Associate Member
  • Platinum
  • ******
  • United States, New Jersey (formerly of London)
  • Posts: 1570
Re: 1966 230SL Rear Suspension
« Reply #1 on: December 17, 2015, 09:37:41 »
First, you'd want to figure out what the rattle is. It shouldn't rattle! It could be a host of things. In my case, the rear compensating spring was rubbing against the cross-member to which the fuel tank is secured.

The big central bush is a good place to start if you want to refresh the rubbers and is the easiest job. You could look at the bushes at the rear of the trailing arms, but from my experience they don't wear hugely (there's also the doughnuts at the front of the arms). It's not a small job and so replacing them may not be worth the effort. Any decent garage will be able to test your shocks on the machine designed for that purpose. Not much point replacing shocks that are perfectly good. They should be Bilstein, but I prefer the firmer ride of Koni Classics. You might also look at your tyres. If they're a decent brand and in good condition, fine, but old, cheap tyres could make the ride less good. There are rubbers at each end of the springs. Again, provided they're correctly seated and look ok, there's probably little gain in replacing them but worth checking.

There is a lot of rubber at the rear end. If you're taking out the springs to replace those rubbers, you may as well do the lot.

Personally, I'd focus on the rattle.

JH
James Howard
1966 LHD 230SL

Harry

  • Full Member
  • Gold
  • *****
  • USA, TN, Knoxville
  • Posts: 732
Re: 1966 230SL Rear Suspension
« Reply #2 on: December 17, 2015, 10:55:53 »
Thanks James.  Good point on the shocks.  I'll know a little more when I get under the car.
Harry Bailey
Knoxville, TN
1966 230SL
Automatic

ja17

  • Full Member
  • Platinum
  • ******
  • USA, OH, Blacklick
  • Posts: 7414
Re: 1966 230SL Rear Suspension
« Reply #3 on: December 19, 2015, 04:12:42 »
Never had to replace the trailing arm rubber bushings for years (where they mount to the chassis). Now that these cars are fifty years old, seems like they are all going bad. Look at the condition of these first, since you already replaced the trunk mount.  Shocks can make noise when bad also. 
Joe Alexander
Blacklick, Ohio
1969 Dark Olive 280SL
2002 ML55 AMG (tow vehicle)
2002 SLK32 AMG (350 hp)
1982 300TD Wagon turbo 4spd.
1963 404 Mercedes Unimog (Swedish Army)
1989 flu419 Mercedes Unimog (US Army)
1998 E430
1974 450SLC Rally
1965 220SE Finback

Bonnyboy

  • Full Member
  • Gold
  • *****
  • Canada, BC, North Vancouver
  • Posts: 910
  • 1969 280sl Euro 4sp LSD
Re: 1966 230SL Rear Suspension
« Reply #4 on: December 22, 2015, 00:13:54 »
Its unlikely but check that the brake calipers are solidly mounted.   I had a rattle that would come and go and it was one caliper - before I bent the tabs over the bolts with the retaining plate. 

Not on my car but I have seen a trailing arm loose where it connects to the floor.
Ian
69 280SL
65 F-100
73 CB750K
75 MGB
78 FLH
82 CB750SC
83 VF 1100C
94 FLHTCU
08 NPS50
12 Pro 4X

Benz Dr.

  • Associate Member
  • Platinum
  • ******
  • Canada, ON, Port Lambton
  • Posts: 7220
  • Benz Dr.
Re: 1966 230SL Rear Suspension
« Reply #5 on: December 22, 2015, 05:36:37 »
Anything rubber, seals and axle bearings. Not everything will need replacement but everything should be treated as suspect.
1966 230SL 5 speed, LSD, header pipes, 300SE distributor, ported, polished and balanced, AKA  ''The Red Rocket ''
Dan Caron's SL Barn

1970  3.5 Coupe
1961  190SL
1985   300CD  Turbo Coupe
1981  300SD
2013  GMC  Sierra
1965  230SL
1967 250SL
1970 280SL
1988 560SEC

stickandrudderman

  • Vendor
  • Platinum
  • ******
  • United Kingdom, England, Richmond
  • Posts: 2921
    • http://www.colinferns.com
Re: 1966 230SL Rear Suspension
« Reply #6 on: December 22, 2015, 14:59:16 »
My view is that you should replace ALL suspension rubbers at the same time otherwise you are combining new with old and never really getting the benefit.

ja17

  • Full Member
  • Platinum
  • ******
  • USA, OH, Blacklick
  • Posts: 7414
Re: 1966 230SL Rear Suspension
« Reply #7 on: December 22, 2015, 16:21:57 »
Yes, I agree with Stick, if your time and budget can take the hit. Refreshing all the rubber, seals and bearings is a good investment. The solid axle boot, and the horizontal, cylindrical, rubber/steel bushing are somewhat complicated to change. The bushing is pricey these days also.
Joe Alexander
Blacklick, Ohio
1969 Dark Olive 280SL
2002 ML55 AMG (tow vehicle)
2002 SLK32 AMG (350 hp)
1982 300TD Wagon turbo 4spd.
1963 404 Mercedes Unimog (Swedish Army)
1989 flu419 Mercedes Unimog (US Army)
1998 E430
1974 450SLC Rally
1965 220SE Finback