Hello Gents,
The top gear thing was funny, but I wouldn't trust their cars. I don't know about you, but when I "stomp on it" and activate the kick down on my US Spec automatic 280SL, I indeed accelerate--and noticably so. Of course I can achieve the same result by dropping the selector from 4 to 3. I found it rather amusing that the Chelsea Cars model just seemed to make noise. Perhaps something is wrong with the car they tested, but what they found is certainly not the norm for a well tuned or restored 113.
Everyone seems to have their eyes wide open on some of the costs of restoration. Some facts here--it is extremely rare that you'll ever recover the cost of restoration on any vehicle. Some are better then others of course, and we hope for appreciation--but it can't and should not be done for any financial reasons. I've never added up the bills on mine (and hope to never do so) but I do know I have over 1,000 hours of professional restoration over a 3 year period, NOT including any sublet work or any parts. What's the sublet work? All the chrome plating, the engine rebuild, the fuel injection system, the leather interior. Parts? Darn near everything! It's very easy to rack up the bills. The cost differs not so much by marque but by level of work. If I had a 1964 Ford Falcon in the same condition as my car was, it might have cost darn close in time to restore...and might be worth about $15,000 now!
Those that attended Starfest know that there were a couple of very professional restorations by Paul Russel & Company, and by Hatch & Sons. The rumor was that there was $500,000 in restoration on at least one of these late 1950's cabriolets. Clearly not done for financial reasons--we are looking for a 113 to hit that $100K mark but a cab? Not in our lifetime, I'm afraid.
Why did I do it? Sentimental reasons. My car has been in the family since 1969.
Michael Salemi
1969 280SL
Signal Red w/Black Leather
Restored