Author Topic: Crankshaft movement  (Read 3787 times)

menesesjesse

  • Full Member
  • Silver
  • ****
  • USA, MD, Indian Head
  • Posts: 295
Crankshaft movement
« on: December 07, 2016, 05:36:37 »
I,m tearing down a car that has a lot of issues and I have come across this and need some opinions.  At the crankshaft pulley the crank can be push in and out about a 1/4 to 3/8 of an inch.  I don't think this is normal on a 280 motor. What are your thoughts and where should I check things?   The motor appears to have been rebuilt but not really well by some of the issues I see.  Thanks
Jesse
1966 Mercedes 230 SL auto
2003 Mercedes E500
1992 Ford F150
1994 Ford Bronco
2019 Shelby GT350R
1967 Mercury Cougar XR7

Dave H

  • Associate Member
  • Silver
  • ****
  • United Kingdom, England, Durham
  • Posts: 412
    • Dave H
Re: Crankshaft movement
« Reply #1 on: December 07, 2016, 07:41:38 »
Something off there...crankshaft endplay should only be .004"-.007"
Search on this forum for thrust bearing wear , or crankshaft endplay posts.
Mercedes 250SL    1967
Mercedes 250SLK  2014
Alfa Romeo 166 3.2 Ti
Fiat 500

stickandrudderman

  • Vendor
  • Platinum
  • ******
  • United Kingdom, England, Richmond
  • Posts: 2926
    • http://www.colinferns.com
Re: Crankshaft movement
« Reply #2 on: December 07, 2016, 14:26:18 »
I saw an engine recently that had been "rebuilt". Whoever rebuilt it had installed the thrust bearing on the wrong web......

Shvegel

  • Inactive
  • Platinum
  • ******
  • USA, OH, Cleveland Heights
  • Posts: 2978
Re: Crankshaft movement
« Reply #3 on: December 07, 2016, 18:45:50 »
It just so happens I have my 90,000 mile  280SL M130 engine upside down in my garage with the crank resting on just the lower bearing shells.  I measured the end play and it is .15mm or .006 inches with the original bearing shells in it.  The thrust bearing is on the third journal back from the front of the engine.  I bet the thrust bearing either isn't there or as Stick found it on one he did is on the wrong journal.

Tyler S

  • Associate Member
  • Platinum
  • ******
  • USA, CA, Encinitas
  • Posts: 1613
Re: Crankshaft movement
« Reply #4 on: December 07, 2016, 22:14:39 »
Just a note on the subject; vehicles with manual transmissions tend to have more thrust bearing wear than automatics. Every time the clutch is depressed it loads the thrust bearing.
1968 (67) 250sl. 4 speed manual. DB180 Silver
1955 220 Cabriolet A. White Grey
2019 E450 Wagon. Majestic Blue
1936 Ford PU Flathead V8. Creme on tan interior.
1989 Volkswagen T3 Westfailia Campmobile. Dove Grey (blue)

Benz Dr.

  • Associate Member
  • Platinum
  • ******
  • Canada, ON, Port Lambton
  • Posts: 7220
  • Benz Dr.
Re: Crankshaft movement
« Reply #5 on: December 07, 2016, 23:50:07 »
Cranks have a natural tendency to move forward as they run so you may find more wear on the back portion of the thrust bearing.
1966 230SL 5 speed, LSD, header pipes, 300SE distributor, ported, polished and balanced, AKA  ''The Red Rocket ''
Dan Caron's SL Barn

1970  3.5 Coupe
1961  190SL
1985   300CD  Turbo Coupe
1981  300SD
2013  GMC  Sierra
1965  230SL
1967 250SL
1970 280SL
1988 560SEC

menesesjesse

  • Full Member
  • Silver
  • ****
  • USA, MD, Indian Head
  • Posts: 295
Re: Crankshaft movement
« Reply #6 on: December 08, 2016, 05:09:18 »
I was told that the car ran well but I would question that.  I am thinking the thrust bearings are shot.  the motor doesn't have a serial number so I am thinking it was a factory replacement at one time. I think I will be pulling this motor instead of trying to nurse it to life. Previous information says it has only 130-140 psi on the cylinders. I would say this is a tired motor.  Different question for the 280 motor.  We're the heads shared with the 280 SE motors or is it telltale when you see 280 SE on the head.  Thank you everyone.
Jesse
1966 Mercedes 230 SL auto
2003 Mercedes E500
1992 Ford F150
1994 Ford Bronco
2019 Shelby GT350R
1967 Mercury Cougar XR7

114015

  • Full Member
  • Platinum
  • ******
  • Germany, Nordrhein-Westfalen, Tecklenburg
  • Posts: 2080
Re: Crankshaft movement
« Reply #7 on: December 09, 2016, 00:35:40 »

Jesse...,

You have been long enough a member here to know that or to have read about this.  ;D  ;)

Why don't you just do a quick search? 8)

Basically, there are two series of 280 M130E engines used in our Pagodas: early and late.
The shape of the headgaskets and combustion chambers are slightly different...

https://www.sl113.org/wiki/Engine/CylinderHead

... but there is no difference between M130 sedan versus SL engines a such with regard to the big components (shortblock, cylinder head).
The differences between SL and SE are:
- engine arms
- fuel injection pump set up (and numbering)
- tach drive on the SL engine
- and camshaft (sharper for the SL) on non-US versions: 170 bhp instead of 160 bhp.

That's all.


Best,
A.



Achim
(Germany)