I watch with interest! And on the rocker colour issue, I don't think 'anal' comes into it - that comment was directed - by others, but I wish I'd had the courage earlier - elsewhere I am sure.
When I get the time (presently attending to a very 'dead' SL - maybe it was all that molestation after all!) I might look further into my own example (all references to mint, unmolested, nice, original, unrestored, personal attacks etc have been carefully edited out for this posting) and get back to you with an honest, non-ego based (I have nothing to prove) feedback. I might even remove the covers to see if it can shed any more light on this seemingly perplexing subject!
Nevertheless I repeat what I said in reply to Douglas in another forum, which was "leafing through my Mercedes Gold Portfolio book, with reprints of original, unmolested articles and photographs, I see on pages 9, 21, 25, 26, 31, 32, 35, 41, 51, 59, 60, 61, 67, 74, 77, 85, 134, 147, 157, 158, 161, 162,165 and 172 clear photographs of other SLs that" ...also have contrasting sill or rocker panel covers. I have found this freely available book (try
www.amazon.com, which was my source) invaluable and a fun, relevant (all period articles and pics), and relatively cheap read.
I deliberately did not include reference to photographs in which the contrasting shade (the book, after all, is all B&W) may have been due to lighting conditions. And if Michael's offerings are true, obviously retouching was a bigger employer in those days than photography or publishing!
Cheers to all.
Neil
'64 230SL with questioned dark blue rocker panel (sill) covers.
Point your browsers to
www.realnoteguitars.com.au/merc to see all the non-flattering (yet controversial!) pics.