Author Topic: 230SL with a 2.8 Engine  (Read 3832 times)

ProvingGrounds

  • Guest
230SL with a 2.8 Engine
« on: July 30, 2007, 17:58:58 »
I just bought a restored 230SL with a 2.8 engine in it, and I am not sure if this is a good thing or a bad thing... One one hand I am loosing historical value of the car, but on the other hand I have a nicely rebuilt sought-after 2.8 engine under the hood.Any ideas?

rogerh113

  • Associate Member
  • Senior
  • ***
  • Los Altos, Ca
  • Posts: 225
Re: 230SL with a 2.8 Engine
« Reply #1 on: July 30, 2007, 19:18:24 »
Hello,

I have a 230sl with a 250 engine in it.  I have the car for driving (original intent from MB, I think), and it is a nice upgrade.  The only negative I have heard about the 280 is that the cylinder walls are somewhat thin relative to the 250 - hopefully will not be an issue for you. You have more main bearings and more power/torque than the baseline 230SL engine - only an issue for the purist I think....

Regards -- Roger
1966 230SL black 4 speed (250 low compression engine)

ProvingGrounds

  • Guest
Re: 230SL with a 2.8 Engine
« Reply #2 on: July 30, 2007, 19:29:29 »
This is mainly for resale purposes... So I am wondering what everybody thinks from a buyer's perspective.

Thank you all for your help and support!

ProvingGrounds

  • Guest
Re: 230SL with a 2.8 Engine
« Reply #3 on: July 31, 2007, 17:28:24 »
:: BUMP ::

lurtch

  • Full Member
  • Silver
  • ****
  • USA, CA, Santa Rosa
  • Posts: 376
  • " ICON 66 "
Re: 230SL with a 2.8 Engine
« Reply #4 on: July 31, 2007, 19:39:16 »
Hello  - -

 Just for the record, the 2.8 engine (any of the M130 series) is a slightly better piece of engineering than the 2.3. The best improvement is the double row cam drive chain instead of the single row type. (more durability with less chain stretch) The exhaust headers are cast iron instead of tubular steel, the oil cooler is a valuable addition also.  I have a 280SEL  engine in my 230Sl. A likely reason for you having a 2.8 engine in there is because they are very plentiful in the after market and an engine shop can overhaul one more economically that the 2.3.  Regards, Larry in CA
Larry Hemstreet  in  N. Cal.

1966  230SL  (restored) Met. Anthracite w/ Maroon leather
1981  300TD-T (Concours condition, 86K, GETRAG 5sp.)
1982  300TD-T (parted out)
1986  560SEC (totaled)
1991  300TE (gifted)
1998  E320 (sold)
2004  E320 wagon (gifted)
2008  CLK550 Cabriolet

ja17

  • Full Member
  • Platinum
  • ******
  • USA, OH, Blacklick
  • Posts: 7414
Re: 230SL with a 2.8 Engine
« Reply #5 on: July 31, 2007, 20:50:56 »
Hello,

All 230SL engines had the double row timing chains.  Only the 230 carbureted sedans of the era had a single row timing chain.

The incorrect engine would make only a sligtht difference in value for a "driver" grade W113 as long as it drives well.
If the car is restored for show or investment, the incorrect engine will make more of an impact on value.

Joe Alexander
Blacklick, Ohio
Joe Alexander
Blacklick, Ohio
1969 Dark Olive 280SL
2002 ML55 AMG (tow vehicle)
2002 SLK32 AMG (350 hp)
1982 300TD Wagon turbo 4spd.
1963 404 Mercedes Unimog (Swedish Army)
1989 flu419 Mercedes Unimog (US Army)
1998 E430
1974 450SLC Rally
1965 220SE Finback

ProvingGrounds

  • Guest
Re: 230SL with a 2.8 Engine
« Reply #6 on: July 31, 2007, 23:59:49 »
Thank you Joe, that's what I was thinking as well. The car looks amazing with the only fault I can detect is a missing firewall pad. I will post photos soon!