Author Topic: Engine number vs. chassis number  (Read 4413 times)

Pawel66

  • Full Member
  • Platinum
  • ******
  • Poland, Mazowieckie, Konstancin-Jeziorna
  • Posts: 5493
Re: Engine number vs. chassis number
« Reply #25 on: December 25, 2023, 23:43:14 »
I see, thank you!
Pawel

280SL 1970 automatic 180G Silver
W128 220SE
W121 190SL
G-class

zoegrlh

  • Full Member
  • Gold
  • *****
  • USA, VA, Williamsburg
  • Posts: 808
  • Beauty from top BCW
Re: Engine number vs. chassis number
« Reply #26 on: December 28, 2023, 17:15:18 »
Jose, welcome to our Pagoda Group. You will find a wealth of knowledge about the Pagoda with this group. You were questioning if your motor was the original. As John stated if you motor was replaced by MB in Germany, you will have a tag on the block that will say Original Mercedes Benz, tauschaggregan, with a number of the engine 130—————, and then the Tigi Nr. (Engine block/serial number).  If you have this tag you have a replacement engine, which does not cheapen the value of he SL, because it was put in/replaced by Mercedes Benz..
By the way, we just came back from Porto, what a wonderful city, and great wine. One of the best trips we have taken. Portugal is a hidden Jewel. Bob
Robert Hyatt
Williamsburg, VA.

W113, 1970 280SL, Red leather 242 on Silver Gray Met. 180, 4-speed stick, Euro spec, restored
R172 2012 SLK350, Black Premium leather 801 on Mars Red 590, 7-speed auto
W211, 2007 E320 Bluetec, Cashmere MB Tex 144 on Arctic White 650, 7 speed auto

desousa

  • Junior Level
  • Portugal, Porto, Porto
  • Posts: 9
Re: Engine number vs. chassis number
« Reply #27 on: December 28, 2023, 19:05:30 »
Thanks Bob.
Shhh don’t tell anyone… otherwise it will soon become another tourism mecca…
You are very welcome next time you visit us.
Jose
1964 MB 230SL
1928 Alvis  FD12/50 FWD
1932 Alvis Speed 20SA
1933 Alvis Speed 20SA
1950 Aston Martin DB2 DHC Prototype
1951 Aston Martin DB2
1952 Lagonda 2.6 DHC
1956 MG Magnette
1957 Chevrolet BelAir
1960 Chevrolet Corvette
1968 Volvo 142S
1970 Aston Martin DB6Mk2
2007 Aston Martin Vanquish S

Pawel66

  • Full Member
  • Platinum
  • ******
  • Poland, Mazowieckie, Konstancin-Jeziorna
  • Posts: 5493
Re: Engine number vs. chassis number
« Reply #28 on: December 28, 2023, 20:45:54 »
I was there as well and I liked it a lot! I am more a vodka drinker, but wine was not the only attraction! Will never forget the cruise down the Porto river (we used all vodka supply, they stopped the ship and bought some at the supermarket).

Beautiful architecture!
Pawel

280SL 1970 automatic 180G Silver
W128 220SE
W121 190SL
G-class

John Betsch - "SADIE"

  • Pagoda SL Board
  • Silver
  • ****
  • USA, NY, SOUTHOLD
  • Posts: 403
Re: Engine number vs. chassis number
« Reply #29 on: December 28, 2023, 22:03:24 »
One more data point to add to the collection:

my '65 230SL (German Market) which I have been told would be considered mid run:

VIN: 010662
Automatic
Delivery: 5/17/1965
Engine Number: 2173 (and luckily number on engine matches data card)
JB; 1965 German market SL, Rot Met 571, Summary Code 213 Interior

Benz Dr.

  • Associate Member
  • Platinum
  • ******
  • Canada, ON, Port Lambton
  • Posts: 7220
  • Benz Dr.
Re: Engine number vs. chassis number
« Reply #30 on: December 28, 2023, 23:08:11 »
Matching numbers, or in this case engine numbers, are kind of like " classic cars." It's a thing that has certain meaning but has been locked on to by the car collecting crowd. On cars that can be cloned, which are rare and valuable, it means everything, that, or they're million+ cars and those things do matter. On our 113's, options aside from model, condition, year, and perhaps colour, would be one of the few things that make one car worth more than another, all other things being equal.

Given the fact MB dealers were instructed to stamp the original engine number into a new replacement block, what does matching numbers mean to a mass produced fairly common car? Is it nice to have? Sure. Is it going to bring you more at auction?

( Roll MS in 3....2....1 )
1966 230SL 5 speed, LSD, header pipes, 300SE distributor, ported, polished and balanced, AKA  ''The Red Rocket ''
Dan Caron's SL Barn

1970  3.5 Coupe
1961  190SL
1985   300CD  Turbo Coupe
1981  300SD
2013  GMC  Sierra
1965  230SL
1967 250SL
1970 280SL
1988 560SEC

john.mancini

  • Full Member
  • Gold
  • *****
  • USA, FL, Nokomis
  • Posts: 651
Re: Engine number vs. chassis number
« Reply #31 on: December 29, 2023, 02:01:37 »
Dan, I could not agree with you more. As I watch my newest form of entertainment, Bring a Trailer, I see bidders more concerned about W113 matching engine numbers than overall car condition. BIG mistake. You really can't "forge" a Pagoda like they do with 57 Corvette Fuelies or 67 Corvette 427's. With Pagodas, you only got one engine choice each year. That was it. So............who cares if it's the original block????? Just give me a nice straight, never rusted, never hit Pagoda.
John
65 230SL 519 Red 4-sp
98 911 cab
56 Ford F100
08 Porsche RS60 Spyder
23 Z4M40i

MikeSimon

  • Full Member
  • Platinum
  • ******
  • USA, OH, North Royalton
  • Posts: 2477
Re: Engine number vs. chassis number
« Reply #32 on: December 29, 2023, 13:15:02 »
That's not the point, Gentlemen. I think there is definitely some value to a car that has a number pairing that falls into the "original" category. You can still mess up an 280SL by putting a 2.8L block/motor in that does not belong in the car, i.e.: a 280SE block or an early 2.8L motor in a late car. Unless it is properly documented to me it is a sign of "tampering" and trying to present something that is not there.
1970/71 280SL Automatic
Sandy Beige
Parchment Leather
Power Steering
Automatic
Hardtop
Heated Tinted Rear Window
German specs
3rd owner

Benz Dr.

  • Associate Member
  • Platinum
  • ******
  • Canada, ON, Port Lambton
  • Posts: 7220
  • Benz Dr.
Re: Engine number vs. chassis number
« Reply #33 on: December 30, 2023, 06:35:06 »
That's not the point, Gentlemen. I think there is definitely some value to a car that has a number pairing that falls into the "original" category. You can still mess up an 280SL by putting a 2.8L block/motor in that does not belong in the car, i.e.: a 280SE block or an early 2.8L motor in a late car. Unless it is properly documented to me it is a sign of "tampering" and trying to present something that is not there.

Fair enough.  How much more would you be willing to pay at auction for such a 113?

Tampering? All of these cars have been tampered with. Unless you can find a low miles, original owner, who only worked on their car, it's almost a unicorn these days.
1966 230SL 5 speed, LSD, header pipes, 300SE distributor, ported, polished and balanced, AKA  ''The Red Rocket ''
Dan Caron's SL Barn

1970  3.5 Coupe
1961  190SL
1985   300CD  Turbo Coupe
1981  300SD
2013  GMC  Sierra
1965  230SL
1967 250SL
1970 280SL
1988 560SEC

MikeSimon

  • Full Member
  • Platinum
  • ******
  • USA, OH, North Royalton
  • Posts: 2477
Re: Engine number vs. chassis number
« Reply #34 on: January 01, 2024, 17:40:35 »
Semantics, Dan. If I would be in the market for a W113, I would want to find a car that is not being misrepresented and is as original as possible. yes, I would pay more for a 280SL that has a 130-983 motor than for one with a 130-980.
1970/71 280SL Automatic
Sandy Beige
Parchment Leather
Power Steering
Automatic
Hardtop
Heated Tinted Rear Window
German specs
3rd owner

zoegrlh

  • Full Member
  • Gold
  • *****
  • USA, VA, Williamsburg
  • Posts: 808
  • Beauty from top BCW
Re: Engine number vs. chassis number
« Reply #35 on: January 07, 2024, 18:23:01 »
I agree with Dan, if the replacement engine was put in by MB, and particularly by MB( in Europe MB garages are owned by MB) then it’s a no brainer that the replacement is A OK, and done well to MB specs. But yes, the Pagoda would not be an example of a SL from factory assembly line. However, any of those prestigiously restored Pagodas are in fact not exactly the same care that came off the assembly line. So numbers might mean a lot to the collector, they are missing the boat if they are waiting for perfect car to come across the auction block. What will the market bring, it’s all c about timing, buyers in the market, financing rates, etc. if I was to sell my SL, I C don’t think I would use BAT, heard too much negative comments about it. I think that buyers trend to write negative comments about your car, so as to keep the bidding lower. That’s what I’ve been told. Anyway that’s my two cents. Bob
Robert Hyatt
Williamsburg, VA.

W113, 1970 280SL, Red leather 242 on Silver Gray Met. 180, 4-speed stick, Euro spec, restored
R172 2012 SLK350, Black Premium leather 801 on Mars Red 590, 7-speed auto
W211, 2007 E320 Bluetec, Cashmere MB Tex 144 on Arctic White 650, 7 speed auto