Author Topic: Coker Phoenix  (Read 8066 times)

hauser

  • Guest
Coker Phoenix
« on: September 08, 2009, 20:02:27 »
I decided to bite the bullet and purchase a set of the 185HR14 Coker Phoenix tires.  The tires list for $229.00 each plus shipping.  As I spoke to the sales person I had convinced myself to go ahead and take the plunge until I found out that they are no longer giving MBCA members a discount!  I talked to three different people at Coker talking my way up the totem pole and was denied a discount.  The last person I dealt with was Charles at ext 251  1-800-215-6336.

Here's the best deal they would come up with.

A minimum order of twenty tires for a price of $191.39 each. 

Let me know if anyone is interested.


cascadia

  • Inactive
  • Senior
  • ***
  • USA, OR, Portland
  • Posts: 246
    • http://www.cascadiaclassic.com
Re: Coker Phoenix
« Reply #1 on: September 08, 2009, 23:59:42 »
An alternative might be the Vredestein Sprint Classic.  I just ordered a set for $600, they have a rub strip and a nice classic tread pattern.  Got them from Universal Tire, the photo on their website doesn't show the rub strip, but they look like the photo below, tire size is 185HR14.

http://universaltire.com/cart.php?target=product&product_id=25050&category_id=340
Bob in Portland, Oregon.

hauser

  • Guest
Re: Coker Phoenix
« Reply #2 on: September 09, 2009, 00:51:33 »
I believe that Universal get their tires from Coker.  Looks like a nice tire but I want the WW.

69280sl

  • Full Member
  • Gold
  • *****
  • USA, IL, Elk Grove
  • Posts: 568
Re: Coker Phoenix
« Reply #3 on: September 09, 2009, 02:25:02 »
Hauser: Check out Uniroyal "Tiger Paw". They come in 185-14 and have the 3/4" whitewall. Looks like a Pheonix from 5 ft way. Mine cost less than $100 each including taxes and mounting. So far I',m very happy with them. I like the idea of sAvinig money but decided against the Pheonix primarily because of some quality issues which have been discussed here.

Gus
Gus

68 280sl, signal red/ beige/black softtop. Car # 1084

hauser

  • Guest
Re: Coker Phoenix
« Reply #4 on: September 09, 2009, 03:50:18 »
Gus, I had looked at the Uniroyal before when I had purchase new tires two years ago.  One problem with modern tires is that sooner or later will be discontinued.  My Yokohama's are no longer in production, it was a very short run on these tires.  If I happen to damage a modern tire beyond repair most likely I'll be looking at buying a new set.

I am aware that there were problems with the early run of the Phoenix and perhaps these issues have been addressed.  Mike Salemi has had these on his car for a while now and has had nothing but praises.


mdsalemi

  • Pagoda SL Board
  • Platinum
  • ******
  • USA, NC, Davidson
  • Posts: 7061
Re: Coker Phoenix
« Reply #5 on: September 10, 2009, 12:40:40 »
I am aware that there were problems with the early run of the Phoenix and perhaps these issues have been addressed.  Mike Salemi has had these on his car for a while now and has had nothing but praises.

A former Pagoda SL Group member, and former 113 owner vehemently disagreed with me on the Cokers (and pretty much on everything else I ever had to say as well).  He claimed "many known instances" of tread separation on the Cokers, and basically dismissed them as expensive junk and me as some patsy for Coker.  Well, tread separation isn't limited to these tires, and I've had it on Michelin X, XZX; I've had premature wear (leading to tires that shimmied like nobody's business) on Goodrich Comp T/A's, and plenty of other tire issues as well since I started driving in 1973.  So far, none on the Cokers I have.  That does NOT make them perfect, only points to their infrequent use on a collectible car and my good luck.  Those of you who read my article that appeared in The Star on tire balance http://www.mbca.org/pages/star/articles/TheStar_0508.pdf will note that the Cokers presented quite a range of correction.  I have not taken other popular tires on the same machine, such as these Vredesteins, but the rep for Hunter who did the project with me that resulted in the article wasn't at all surprised by these differences in each tire; nor was he surprised that one of them had to be sent back as "not correctible" in the balance process.  Bottom line?  I think the Cokers are much like any other tire in terms of quality of manufacture and consistency.

The Cokers may be expensive, but they have always been so.  I think that has a lot to do with peoples resistance to them; they generally were about twice the price of anything else, and goodness knows this group collectively doesn't like anything expensive (but perhaps the resale value of their cars!  ;)).  But if you think the Coker's are expensive, you can always buy new shoes for your 113 in the form of the reissued classic Michelin MXV-P in the correct 185-14 size.  They are only $324.00 each.  You can get them at Longstone Tyre in the UK or Performance Plus in the US.  However I think that a search for "correct" sized good tires for $65 each or whatever anyone thinks is reasonable is going to be about as fruitful as "Lilly's" search for a like new grill star for $200... ???  I don't like anything expensive either, but the Cokers have gone up in price about 40% in price since I bought them.  Grill stars have more than doubled.  Nothing is getting cheaper I'm afraid.  Buy it now, and in the coming years look back on how smart you were to buy it when you did! ;)

I think Tom Sargeant had one of the early runs of the Cokers but that was a very long time ago; I remember talking with him about it at PUB in 2005.  That first run didn't have the rub strip either.

Most people here have nice things to say about the tires they chose.  My first tire didn't work well, it was a Pirelli.  The Cokers have been fine.  Good balance helps, so does driving other cars with other tires to get a feel for the differences.  One of the highlights of PUB is the ability to do this.
« Last Edit: September 10, 2009, 12:53:13 by mdsalemi »
Michael Salemi
Davidson, North Carolina (Charlotte Area) USA
1969 280SL (USA-Spec)
Signal Red 568G w/Black Leather (Restored)
2023 Ford Maverick Lariat Hybrid "Area 51"
2023 Ford Escape Hybrid
2024 Ford Mustang Mach Ex PEV

zoegrlh

  • Full Member
  • Gold
  • *****
  • USA, VA, Williamsburg
  • Posts: 811
  • Beauty from top BCW
Re: Coker Phoenix
« Reply #6 on: September 13, 2009, 06:09:32 »
You might want to look at my input to the thread on Tires, I did a lot of research on both the new tires available on today's market suitable for our cars, the old original tires (Phoenix, Continental) and the original specs of the original tires.  As my research concluded, the Vredestein Classic was the only tire with the same specs as original Phoenix tires.  I wanted the feel of the original ride so I ordered 5 Vredestein tires.  However, I did not buy from Coker, I ordered from a supplier in Chicago that ordered them for me from the factory in Holland.  They really make my SL stand well.  I can give you the information on them if you would like, however please do read the thread.
Bob
Robert Hyatt
Williamsburg, VA.

W113, 1970 280SL, Red leather 242 on Silver Gray Met. 180, 4-speed stick, Euro spec, restored
R172 2012 SLK350, Black Premium leather 801 on Mars Red 590, 7-speed auto
W211, 2007 E320 Bluetec, Cashmere MB Tex 144 on Arctic White 650, 7 speed auto

mdsalemi

  • Pagoda SL Board
  • Platinum
  • ******
  • USA, NC, Davidson
  • Posts: 7061
Re: Coker Phoenix
« Reply #7 on: September 13, 2009, 14:08:30 »
As my research concluded, the Vredestein Classic was the only tire with the same specs as original Phoenix tires. 

I don't know exactly all the specs, but remember reading the original Conti RA60 and the Firestone Phoenix were "half radial" which had both bias and radial ply construction.  I don't think that the production lasted until the end of the W113's, but that's where it started.  I don't know about the Vredestein but the Cokers are full radial.  Though they are not indicated on the website they are indeed H rated; and they are 185 and 80 series like the Vredestiens.  So aside from the cost and whitewall issue, I don't know why the Coker or Vredestiens would be any better or worse than each other or how they might be closer to the RA60/Phoenix of the mid 1960's.

Often the choice comes down to whitewall or not.  Maybe these guys--Diamondback-- http://www.widewhitewalltires.com/ can add the whitewall to a Vredestein.  I remember speaking with them some years ago and I thought they can add a true white wall to any tire.
Michael Salemi
Davidson, North Carolina (Charlotte Area) USA
1969 280SL (USA-Spec)
Signal Red 568G w/Black Leather (Restored)
2023 Ford Maverick Lariat Hybrid "Area 51"
2023 Ford Escape Hybrid
2024 Ford Mustang Mach Ex PEV

bootes

  • Guest
Re: Coker Phoenix
« Reply #8 on: July 21, 2010, 03:43:07 »
An alternative might be the Vredestein Sprint Classic.  I just ordered a set for $600, they have a rub strip and a nice classic tread pattern.  Got them from Universal Tire, the photo on their website doesn't show the rub strip, but they look like the photo below, tire size is 185HR14.

http://universaltire.com/cart.php?target=product&product_id=25050&category_id=340

I thought the rub strip was designed to protect the white wall so I was curious as to shy the Vredestein would have a rub strip since they don't come with a white wall?

jacovdw

  • Guest
Re: Coker Phoenix
« Reply #9 on: July 21, 2010, 09:17:38 »
The rub strip was there for protection of the wheel cover.

paulr

  • Guest
Re: Coker Phoenix
« Reply #10 on: July 21, 2010, 09:25:03 »
which doesn't work..!