230SL engine or not? Ask the 230SL detectives

[perry113]

Maybe I'm wrong, but the casting features on the valve cover of this engine look like those you see on a 250 and 280 series engine.

Did they have 230 series engines with this later style valve cover casting?

[J. Huber]

Perry -- does this seem to be the same as yours??? (looks the same to me)

[perry113]

Perry -- does this seem to be the same as yours??? (looks the same to me)

The picture you posted looks like a 230SL. I base this on the valve cover casting.

Take a look at this picture. I marked the provisions I question in the valve cover casting that would lead me to believe my original posted picture is a 250 or 280 series engine.
Did any 230 series engines has these provisions?

[al_lieffring]

I think the banjo fitting breather tube was replaced with the rubber elbow during the 65 model year.  280sl's have a 1/4 twist oil cap. My 66 230 has the same valve cover as the one in your photo, The notches you hilighted were for improved crank case vent baffeling.

[Naj ✝︎]

Maybe I'm wrong, but the casting features on the valve cover of this engine look like those you see on a 250 and 280 series engine.

Did they have 230 series engines with this later style valve cover casting?

What are the VIN and Engine #s of your car?

naj

[Jordan]

Perry,

See attached pic.  Mine is a 1966 230SL and it also has the indents and it si original.
Hope this helps.

[perry113]

Then my question is answered.

Thank you.

[menesesjesse]

If your car is a 65 I would think your valve cover looks like mine.  The rubber breather was later then 65 I believe.  I have a late 65 and it was just rebuilt.  The spark plug wire frame is also missing .  I attached my photo for reference.  Hope it helps.  Your valve cover is definitely right.
Jesse

[jacovdw]

The change in the breather line was introduced in December 1965 and that included the fitting on the valve cover.