Author Topic: engine swap auto vs. standard  (Read 7640 times)

jpambca

  • Guest
engine swap auto vs. standard
« on: December 21, 2011, 06:07:06 »
Hi:
The engine in my '66 230SL has seen better days. I've been offered a used engine from another 230SL in apparently good condition but it comes from a car with an automatic transmission whereas my car has a 4spd standard.  Can this engine be swapped over without nasty and arduous modifications? 
Many thanks.
J

ja17

  • Full Member
  • Platinum
  • ******
  • USA, OH, Blacklick
  • Posts: 7384
Re: engine swap auto vs. standard
« Reply #1 on: December 21, 2011, 13:50:16 »
Hello,

Are you trying to keep it standard shift or converting to auto?
Joe Alexander
Blacklick, Ohio
1969 Dark Olive 280SL
2002 ML55 AMG (tow vehicle)
2002 SLK32 AMG (350 hp)
1982 300TD Wagon turbo 4spd.
1963 404 Mercedes Unimog (Swedish Army)
1989 flu419 Mercedes Unimog (US Army)
1998 E430
1974 450SLC Rally
1965 220SE Finback

jpambca

  • Guest
Re: engine swap auto vs. standard
« Reply #2 on: December 21, 2011, 18:37:09 »
I want to keep it standard.  I've looked at the engine presently in my car and the numbers indicate it is for a 250SL.  It has "250" stamped on it, and the engine serial indicates "129" as apposed to "127" which is the indicator for the 2.3L engine.  I'm thinking that switching back to a 127 is a matter of dropping it in, perhaps changing motor mounts.  Any thoughts?

Many thanks for the assistance.
J

merrill

  • Full Member
  • Platinum
  • ******
  • USA, TX, Austin
  • Posts: 1362
Re: engine swap auto vs. standard
« Reply #3 on: December 21, 2011, 20:16:23 »
What is wrong with the motor?
Metric can rebuild for about 6K.

If it is not too far gone they may buy it for re sale....
Matt
Austin Tx
66 230 sl - "white"
78 300 D - Blue
98 C230

stickandrudderman

  • Vendor
  • Platinum
  • ******
  • United Kingdom, England, Richmond
  • Posts: 2900
    • http://www.colinferns.com
Re: engine swap auto vs. standard
« Reply #4 on: December 21, 2011, 21:35:08 »
There are quite a few differences between the installations. Nothing a competent person couldn't deal with but my guess is if you need to ask the question you probably shouldn't get involved. It'll be a lot simpler to simply o/haul your existing engine or find another good 129  one (with manual trans) to change it for.

ja17

  • Full Member
  • Platinum
  • ******
  • USA, OH, Blacklick
  • Posts: 7384
Re: engine swap auto vs. standard
« Reply #5 on: December 21, 2011, 23:01:16 »
Hello Jp,

You cannot switch the flywheels on the M127 engine and the M 129 engine. They have different crankshafts and balancing. Even the flywheel bolt diameter is different on these two engine  types.  You would have to find a standard flywheel and bolts from an M127 engine in order to use the M127 engine.
Joe Alexander
Blacklick, Ohio
1969 Dark Olive 280SL
2002 ML55 AMG (tow vehicle)
2002 SLK32 AMG (350 hp)
1982 300TD Wagon turbo 4spd.
1963 404 Mercedes Unimog (Swedish Army)
1989 flu419 Mercedes Unimog (US Army)
1998 E430
1974 450SLC Rally
1965 220SE Finback

Benz Dr.

  • Vendor
  • Platinum
  • ******
  • Canada, ON, Port Lambton
  • Posts: 7217
  • Benz Dr.
Re: engine swap auto vs. standard
« Reply #6 on: December 22, 2011, 02:52:02 »
Hello Jp,

You cannot switch the flywheels on the M127 engine and the M 129 engine. They have different crankshafts and balancing. Even the flywheel bolt diameter is different on these two engine  types.  You would have to find a standard flywheel and bolts from an M127 engine in order to use the M127 engine.

 That's odd, because I have a 230SL here with a 280SL flywheel on it. Everything seems to work so I'm not sure what to think. I noticed this during a recent rebuild and saw that they used a 280SL pressure plate and throw out bearing. If it's not supposed to work, it does on this set up. I would expect it to vibrate but it doesn't and it hasn't been ballanced that I can see.
So, I believe you and everything but this car doesn't. ;)

 Just a note on auto to standard trans conversions:
 It's far more difficult to change a standard over to an auto than it is to change an auto over to a standard. If you want an auto trans car, buy it that way. 
1966 230SL 5 speed, LSD, header pipes, 300SE distributor, ported, polished and balanced, AKA  ''The Red Rocket ''
Dan Caron's SL Barn

1970  3.5 Coupe
1961  190SL
1985   300CD  Turbo Coupe
1981  300SD
2013  GMC  Sierra
1965  230SL
1967 250SL
1970 280SL
1988 560SEC

ja17

  • Full Member
  • Platinum
  • ******
  • USA, OH, Blacklick
  • Posts: 7384
Re: engine swap auto vs. standard
« Reply #7 on: December 22, 2011, 04:52:52 »
Hello Dan,

Most interesting Dan.........Aren't all M127 (230SL engine) flywheels counter balanced?  Also all 280SL M130 engines are balanced?  It should not work unless someone has done some serious modification on the flywheel ?

 Bolt heads on the M127 are 17mm and the heads on the M130 are 19mm.  In addition the bolt diameters are different.  I don't believe Mercedes went to the balanced flywheel until the seven main bearing engine of the 250SLs and 280SLs

Jp, just remove one flywheel bolt on each engine and check the diameters.
Joe Alexander
Blacklick, Ohio
1969 Dark Olive 280SL
2002 ML55 AMG (tow vehicle)
2002 SLK32 AMG (350 hp)
1982 300TD Wagon turbo 4spd.
1963 404 Mercedes Unimog (Swedish Army)
1989 flu419 Mercedes Unimog (US Army)
1998 E430
1974 450SLC Rally
1965 220SE Finback

Benz Dr.

  • Vendor
  • Platinum
  • ******
  • Canada, ON, Port Lambton
  • Posts: 7217
  • Benz Dr.
Re: engine swap auto vs. standard
« Reply #8 on: December 22, 2011, 15:21:46 »
Joe,
that's what I thought but that what's on this engine. Everything seems to be work so maybe there was some modification done. I should have looked at it more closely when I had it apart.

 I had a 230SL flywheel on my 250SE engine before I changed it over to a 280SL flywheel and it didn't vibrate at all. Six cylinder in-line engines have a tendancy self ballance so maybe that factors into this in some way.
1966 230SL 5 speed, LSD, header pipes, 300SE distributor, ported, polished and balanced, AKA  ''The Red Rocket ''
Dan Caron's SL Barn

1970  3.5 Coupe
1961  190SL
1985   300CD  Turbo Coupe
1981  300SD
2013  GMC  Sierra
1965  230SL
1967 250SL
1970 280SL
1988 560SEC

stickandrudderman

  • Vendor
  • Platinum
  • ******
  • United Kingdom, England, Richmond
  • Posts: 2900
    • http://www.colinferns.com
Re: engine swap auto vs. standard
« Reply #9 on: December 22, 2011, 20:13:28 »
I've had to change flywheels twice in the last 12 months.
The first was because a car had a counter-balanced weight flywheel when it shouldn't have had, and you should have seen that engine trying to climb out of the car!
The second was due to a clicking noise caused by a cracked flex plate.
For the first one I simply machined off the counter weight and, since the engine was in bits, had the whole crank/flywheel/clutch/damper assembly balanced as a unit by these excellent people:
http://www.vibrationfree.co.uk/
The second left me in a bit of a quandry; I could simply order a new flywheel to part number at £350 but I had no guarentee that the engine or crank in the car were the original items. I was therefore concerned that if I ordered the "correct" part it wouldn't actually fit when it arrived. I decided that I would be better of finding a second hand flywheel that matched the failed one.
The combinations of hole size and counterbalance were then revealed with two different bolt hole sizes being found on both types of flywheel. I couldn't find a satisfactory flywheel without the counterbalance so I asked the same people above to modify and balance a counterbalanced one to suit my requirements.
A little long winded but it was the only way I could guarantee results.

ja17

  • Full Member
  • Platinum
  • ******
  • USA, OH, Blacklick
  • Posts: 7384
Re: engine swap auto vs. standard
« Reply #10 on: December 23, 2011, 06:06:32 »
Yes, I have also used a M127 flywheel on a M130 engine, but like yourself had to have the counter balance  machined off to balance the flywheel. I then had the bolt holes in the M127 flywheel bored to fit the larger crankshaft bolts of the M130 crankshaft. Everything worked fine after this.

However I do not understand how a M127 engine can use a M130 flywheel  unless special bolts are made and a counterbalance is added to the flywheel?

Joe Alexander
Blacklick, Ohio
1969 Dark Olive 280SL
2002 ML55 AMG (tow vehicle)
2002 SLK32 AMG (350 hp)
1982 300TD Wagon turbo 4spd.
1963 404 Mercedes Unimog (Swedish Army)
1989 flu419 Mercedes Unimog (US Army)
1998 E430
1974 450SLC Rally
1965 220SE Finback

stickandrudderman

  • Vendor
  • Platinum
  • ******
  • United Kingdom, England, Richmond
  • Posts: 2900
    • http://www.colinferns.com
Re: engine swap auto vs. standard
« Reply #11 on: December 23, 2011, 08:39:35 »
I think the OP has enough information now! ;D

jpambca

  • Guest
Re: engine swap auto vs. standard
« Reply #12 on: December 23, 2011, 19:45:37 »
Thank you to all that responded.  I appreciate the help. 
If I consider the cost of the used M127 engine, plus shipping, plus the time and cost to find an M127 standard transmission flywheel, plus bolts, I might as well spend a few extra bucks and rebuild the M130 that is currently installed in my 230SL.

Thanks again.

perry113

  • Associate Member
  • Gold
  • *****
  • USA, NY, Rensselaer
  • Posts: 671
    • http://picasaweb.google.com/peterperry911113/1970280SECoupe#
Re: engine swap auto vs. standard
« Reply #13 on: December 25, 2011, 17:51:35 »
I thought the 230SL crank and flywheel were all counter balanced together, meaning that if I wanted to convert my 230SL Automatic to a 4 speed manual it would require that I pull the crank on the engine and have it counter balanced to the 4 speed flywheel.

I didn't believe however, this was the case for the 250 and 280SL series.
Peter Perry
1970 911T Bahia Red
1972 911T Albert Blau
1963 220seb coupe barn
1965 230SL Light Ivory automatic
1966 230SL Havana Brown 4 speed Barn Find
1970 280SE living 3.5 donor car

ja17

  • Full Member
  • Platinum
  • ******
  • USA, OH, Blacklick
  • Posts: 7384
Re: engine swap auto vs. standard
« Reply #14 on: December 26, 2011, 15:19:28 »
Hello Perry,
You are mostly correct. However it is possible to match balance the new flywheel up to the old one without removing the crankshaft. In other words, the machine shop, matches the counterbalancing of original flywheel to the new one. In this way the total balanced assembly remains unchanged.
Joe Alexander
Blacklick, Ohio
1969 Dark Olive 280SL
2002 ML55 AMG (tow vehicle)
2002 SLK32 AMG (350 hp)
1982 300TD Wagon turbo 4spd.
1963 404 Mercedes Unimog (Swedish Army)
1989 flu419 Mercedes Unimog (US Army)
1998 E430
1974 450SLC Rally
1965 220SE Finback