Nice ones both of them, but both failed to mention that they are now owned and run by Fiat ;-)
Not quite, Ulf.
When the first commercial was aired, in February of 2011, Fiat was a
minority owner in Chrysler, with about 25% interest. The
majority owner was the UAW (workers VEBA trust, actually)
By the airing of the second commercial on Sunday, now Fiat has a majority interest, something over 52%. However they have been making the benchmarks set by the government and their interest in Chrysler is scheduled to go to 100% before the end of 2012. But, they are not there yet--the VEBA, the US and Canadian governments still have something to say.
Alfred, if the Silverado spot reminded you of cheap Hollywood B movies, well I suppose they achieved their goal! I watched the commercial on Youtube on Friday; they already had plenty of hits on Friday afternoon long before the Sunday airing. As you might have surmised, the people at Ford (my wife being one of them; surrounded by and serving the marketing groups at Ford and Lincoln) "were not amused". There is a long history of these "****-for-tat" commercials about trucks, but rarely does anyone take what amounts to a cheap shot like this one. Personally I think they (Ford) ought to internally, with their ad agencies, come up with a retort, just for amusement and not for commercial purposes. Would keep the ad people and employees happy--nothing like a little revenge, eh? But, since the Ford F-series--the truck poor Dave who didn't make it drove--has outsold every car and truck made for many years, Ford isn't too concerned about a public anything I'm sure. Everyone we talked to loved the part about the Twinkies. I wonder how much Hostess (are they not bankrupt?) had to pay for that co-branding. The raining frogs--one of the Biblical plaques from Exodus--was a nice touch at the end.
Speaking of "hits" the Acura NSX (tnx for correction) spot with Jerry Seinfeld and Jay Leno had
over 10,000,000 hits when I saw that one on Friday afternoon on Youtube. They showed it twice in the Superbowl, each with a slightly different edit.
I agree with Alfred about the Clint Eastwood commercial for Chrysler: more about Detroit than the Chrysler vehicle, unlike last year's Eminem ad for the 200. This year's spot was more generic and didn't tout any one specific car.