Author Topic: Odd CO% mixture question  (Read 4605 times)

Michael C

  • Guest
Odd CO% mixture question
« on: January 09, 2013, 23:09:08 »
Okay, here goes, I have a 1970 W108 with an M130 motor (Same as my 280SL).  Here is the question.  On the 1970 model year the CSS is only used for the A/C.  While in gear (Automatic) a vacuum pot is used to open the intake a little allowing more air in thus raising the idle.  The only issue I can see with this is that when you put the car in drive, it leans the engine while sitting at a stop.  If I set the CO% at the suggested 3.5-4.5% while in park, it lowers to about 2% in drive at a stop.

Should I be adjusting my mixture while in gear?  (My SL of the same year has a 4 speed and don't have these issues)
Gotta love these early emissions

Thanks

Michael

Benz Dr.

  • Associate Member
  • Platinum
  • ******
  • Canada, ON, Port Lambton
  • Posts: 7220
  • Benz Dr.
Re: Odd CO% mixture question
« Reply #1 on: January 09, 2013, 23:49:44 »
That's an interesting question.
 I would say that you can leave your idle mixture ratio where it is. When the throttle opens the engine RPM should remain about the same because it's under load. There's more than enough fuel coming through the injectors and all you've done is add a bit more air when the throttle opens.

 You should be OK at 2% when the throttle opens but it wouldn't run at all if you set the idle mixture that way. The engine would lean out and stall at a 2% setting but not at 3% or higher.

I wouldn't worry too much on the numbers and I'd concentrate more on getting it to run smoothly in gear.   
1966 230SL 5 speed, LSD, header pipes, 300SE distributor, ported, polished and balanced, AKA  ''The Red Rocket ''
Dan Caron's SL Barn

1970  3.5 Coupe
1961  190SL
1985   300CD  Turbo Coupe
1981  300SD
2013  GMC  Sierra
1965  230SL
1967 250SL
1970 280SL
1988 560SEC

stickandrudderman

  • Vendor
  • Platinum
  • ******
  • United Kingdom, England, Richmond
  • Posts: 2924
    • http://www.colinferns.com
Re: Odd CO% mixture question
« Reply #2 on: January 10, 2013, 00:43:32 »
Firstly, i have never seen such an arrangement on a 130 engine. I have seen what looks like a vacuum pot but is in fact a pressure cushion that slows down a closing throttle. Can you post a picture?
Secondly, a vacuum pot does not introduce any extra air unless it's failed. It simply utilises the vacuum present in the intake manifold to do mechanical work.
A good example of this is the much discussed (recently) brake servo (booster). The application of the brakes does not change your CO unless the booster has failed.

Michael C

  • Guest
Re: Odd CO% mixture question
« Reply #3 on: January 10, 2013, 03:28:06 »
Not sure how to post a picture on here but if you look in the BBB page "07-14/7"  and look at figures 07-14/21 and 14/22 you a picture & drawing.

ctaylor738

  • Full Member
  • Platinum
  • ******
  • USA, VA, Falls Church
  • Posts: 1174
Re: Odd CO% mixture question
« Reply #4 on: January 12, 2013, 13:48:09 »
You would think that if the vacuum pot moved the linkage, it would move the lever on the pump and you would get a little more fuel to go with the air.  Maybe there is some slop in the linkage that is preventing this. 

Chuck Taylor
1963 230SL #00133
1970 280SL #13027 (restored and sold)
1966 230SL #15274 (sold)
1970 280SL #14076 (sold)
Falls Church VA

GGR

  • Associate Member
  • Platinum
  • ******
  • USA, DC, Washington
  • Posts: 1470
Re: Odd CO% mixture question
« Reply #5 on: January 13, 2013, 11:44:18 »
CO goes down with rev. I f you happen to driveyour car with an on-board measuring device you will note that the CO is around 4% at idle and then will go lower when you drive. So I imagine that by accelerating idle for AC you just see what happens during normal driving.

Michael C

  • Guest
Re: Odd CO% mixture question
« Reply #6 on: January 14, 2013, 18:03:59 »
Thanks ctaylor.  No slop on my linkage.  On the 70 & 71 Mercedes used a "Slip linkage" on the rod going to the butterfly.  This allows the vacuum pot to open the intake butterfly without moving the rest of the linkage.  It's a pretty strange set up.  At the time of design, it was a good way to lower emissions at idle while in gear.

ctaylor738

  • Full Member
  • Platinum
  • ******
  • USA, VA, Falls Church
  • Posts: 1174
Re: Odd CO% mixture question
« Reply #7 on: January 15, 2013, 03:21:48 »
Well, I'd say it's operating as designed.  Seems odd that in gear and under load when a slightly richer mixture would be desirable, the mixture by design would go leaner.  If in-gear idle is a problem, you can always fatten the mixture a bit.
Chuck Taylor
1963 230SL #00133
1970 280SL #13027 (restored and sold)
1966 230SL #15274 (sold)
1970 280SL #14076 (sold)
Falls Church VA

jacovdw

  • Guest
Re: Odd CO% mixture question
« Reply #8 on: January 16, 2013, 18:31:00 »
...I would say that you can leave your idle mixture ratio where it is. When the throttle opens the engine RPM should remain about the same because it's under load. There's more than enough fuel coming through the injectors and all you've done is add a bit more air when the throttle opens.

 You should be OK at 2% when the throttle opens but it wouldn't run at all if you set the idle mixture that way. The engine would lean out and stall at a 2% setting but not at 3% or higher.

I wouldn't worry too much on the numbers and I'd concentrate more on getting it to run smoothly in gear.   

I agree with Dan.

This is exactly the same setup that is found on the W114's with the Zenith carburetors.
If the engine is under load at idle and the speed drops, the vacuum in the manifold drops as well.
The resulting drop in vacuum causes the spring loaded plunger to extend and hence increasing the idle speed slightly to prevent stalling.

The main aim is to adjust the engine idle speed with the vacuum regulator to prevent the idle speed from dropping too much when, for example, you do the following:

a) switch the AC on
b) engage Drive whilst stationary
c) turn the steering wheel whilst stationary (cars with power steering)

If you adjust the mixture with the transmission in D, you might lean it out too much and stall/stumble.

Attached, is a picture of what Michael is referring to.