Garry,
congratulations on your work and productive activity. I remember one of the 2000 posts when you explained how you wake up early in the morning to "decontaminate" our forum from spam messages. This made me realize how - among others - thanks to your work - our forum is different from other places, where not only banners and other pop-ups eat us the space but also fight with spams for the doubtful privilege of deterring Members from the site. In your case, besides contributing 2000 posts, your contribution is important also because of the number of spam posts you cleaned up, and those, I am sure, exceed the 2000 number
Once more, thank you also for the invisible part of your work, that we all benefit from, without knowing that it's mostly hand-made work.
69280SL
Hard not to agree in principle with your arguments. As a next step, out of the insane curiosity I hit the Membership column to scroll down the list classified by number of posts and tried to see who is around 200 inputs while keeping the Junior Level status to see who is the stigmatized culprit, and… I found none. The first one meeting such criteria was below 50 posts. This changes nothing to your point that - as I said - are very valid in my view, but the scale of the "abomination" looked much smaller
Now, taking the risk of reviving many old discussions, I must confess that I am still confused by the titles Members get here: Junior on free registration and Full Member status for paying ones are self explanatory, as are Board Member or Inactive titles. but what are the criteria of being Bronze or Silver? And what means Regular? I do sense that all these categories are honorary, but I suspects that some (if not most) Members do not know how the system works.
So, as Garry kindly offered in his commemorative post to expose the relation between titles and Membership, I would encourage that this very motivating passage is completed to give the full explanation.