Author Topic: Why "113"?  (Read 3648 times)

Joe

  • Full Member
  • Silver
  • ****
  • USA, CO, Colorado Springs
  • Posts: 383
Why "113"?
« on: August 28, 2004, 19:34:53 »
I don't think I've seen the answer to this question before. Why did MB call our chassis the "113?" Does it refer to a length or other dimension?
Joe2

Benz Dr.

  • Associate Member
  • Platinum
  • ******
  • Canada, ON, Port Lambton
  • Posts: 7220
  • Benz Dr.
Re: Why "113"?
« Reply #1 on: August 29, 2004, 22:50:15 »
I'm going to guess here but the numbering sort of follows a pre set plan.
The first sedans to use the basic floor pan of the 113 were the 110 fin cars. The coupes were known as 111's and the air suspension cars were known as 112's. Since the 230SL came out at the same time and had similar running gear the logical number would have been 113.
Later on they came out with the 108 sedan with the same air suspension car being the 109. This set these cars apart as being different in chassis design even though they usd the same basic engines.

Alomg came the 114 sedan ( I still drive one ) and the smaller 115. The bigger replacement was the 116 which was followed by the 126 ( drive one of those too )
123's were followed by 124's even though they are all different cars the evolution continues.

The lowest number used is a 107 and the highest is a 198 both are SL's. I think the first numbers used outside of this was the 202.

Daniel G Caron
1966 230SL 5 speed, LSD, header pipes, 300SE distributor, ported, polished and balanced, AKA  ''The Red Rocket ''
Dan Caron's SL Barn

1970  3.5 Coupe
1961  190SL
1985   300CD  Turbo Coupe
1981  300SD
2013  GMC  Sierra
1965  230SL
1967 250SL
1970 280SL
1988 560SEC

Ben

  • Guest
Re: Why "113"?
« Reply #2 on: August 30, 2004, 05:36:06 »
I've always wondered the same thing and agree with Dan's explanation !

Why didn't the numbers increase though.......I mean why go from 198 backwards to 113 then backwards to 107 ??

There was also a 201, before the 202 before the 203 ...... ;)

Regards,
Ben in Ireland.
'64 230SL 4sp.
'03 CLK Kompressor

Albert-230SL

  • Guest
Re: Why "113"?
« Reply #3 on: August 30, 2004, 06:24:57 »
quote:
Originally posted by Ben

I've always wondered the same thing and agree with Dan's explanation !

Why didn't the numbers increase though.......I mean why go from 198 backwards to 113 then backwards to 107 ??

There was also a 201, before the 202 before the 203 ...... ;)

 :)  This issue of the numbers and order is funny... The "Silver Arrow" Grand Prix MB of the '30s, the W125, is just between the E Class (W124) and the S Class (W126) of the '80s... [:0]

Regards


Albert de la Torre Chavalera
Barcelona (Catalunya/Spain)
Feb.'64 230 SL Euro 113042-10-002432
« Last Edit: August 30, 2004, 06:29:51 by Albert-230SL »

Klaus

  • Guest
Re: Why "113"?
« Reply #4 on: September 13, 2004, 11:52:34 »
Part numbers for MB vehicles used to have 10 digits, e.g. 113 985 01 02, of which the first three describe the vehicle or engine model, the next three the group (e.g. injection, electric etc.), the next two the version (from 00 to 99) and the last two the subgroup within the group. While the engineers designed the part or car, a special standards department, Normenabteilung, issued all the part numbers so that no two engineers could use the same number.
This department also looked for free numbers or a group of free numbers when R&D told them that they wanted to build a new series of models. There was no rule for a link of these internal numbers to others in the system, besides that the first digit had to be
1 or 2 for passenger cars and passenger car gas engines
3and 4 for trucks, buses and their engines
5 for large diesel engines (e.g. boats)
6 for diesel engines
7 for gas turbines
8 for military engines (e.g. for tanks)
With the advent of the 201 it looked like there would be some order (201 and up C-Class, 210 and up E-Class, 220 and up S-Class, 230 and up SL-Class), but with the CL and CLK models inbetween this order is already crowded that it can't last very long.

Klaus
1969 280 SL