Author Topic: 1964 5.0sl  (Read 3066 times)

hauser

  • Guest
1964 5.0sl
« on: September 02, 2004, 09:30:01 »
Why can't people stop messing with perfection?  Check out this 1969 W113 Mercedes-Ford 5.0L on ebay[:0]. http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&category=6338&item=2488099555&rd=1

1969 280sl 5 spd        1999 ML320          Gainesville,Fl.

Malc

  • Guest
Re: 1964 5.0sl
« Reply #1 on: September 02, 2004, 10:01:23 »
Why do you think (when I looked) there are no bids!

While messing about with cars is IMHO is OK, remember that's how MG started... However I would of used Mercedes parts, like a 6.3litre v8 :) .

I have a big old BMW 3.0CSI which I am updating by using parts from a 1992 5-series (cheap as chips here) by adding such things as better brakes, ABS, Modern ECU etc then I end up with a "classic" daily driver

Malc

Albert-230SL

  • Guest
Re: 1964 5.0sl
« Reply #2 on: September 02, 2004, 11:06:38 »
quote:
Originally posted by hauser

Why can't people stop messing with perfection?  Check out this 1969 W113 Mercedes-Ford 5.0L on ebay


... from this pictures, it seems that the front of the car weights more than usual...

Regards



Albert de la Torre Chavalera
Barcelona (Catalunya/Spain)
Feb.'64 230 SL Euro 113042-10-002432

TheEngineer

  • Associate Member
  • Gold
  • *****
  • USA, West Seattle, WA
  • Posts: 775
  • '69 280SL,Signal Red,
Re: 1964 5.0sl
« Reply #3 on: September 02, 2004, 11:14:47 »
Very interesting! The counter says 807 people looked at it and nobody made a single bid. Why do you think that is?

1969 280SL,Signal Red, A/T, P/S, A/C, Both tops.    Ret. engr. 1967 230SL - Sold
'69 280SL,Signal Red, 09 cam, License BB-59U
'67 230SL, 113042-10-017463 (sld)
'50 Jaguar Roadster XK120, #670.318 (sld)
tired engineer, West-Seattle,WA

Bob G ✝︎

  • Guest
Re: 1964 5.0sl
« Reply #4 on: September 02, 2004, 18:56:31 »
Very interesting. I would raise the front end it looks too low but what a sleeper. Too bad its not a 6.3. or 4.5 V8 conversion

Bob Geco