I've tried to keep out of this debate. I'm going to miss seeing tonights episode.
I'm a big Top Gear fan, but I also believe that certain actions cannot be condoned. Jeremy Clarkson has received official warnings before, and we all have seen his behavior, which is occasionally "close to the edge". None of us know exactly what transpired, and what caused the BBC to suspend him, and pause the program.
In one way BBC perhaps overreacted, yet if one of my employees had received a number of official warnings, and did something again, I'd probably suspend him too. I believe in being consistent and act equally to all employees. A production manager behind the scenes deserves to be treated with respect, even by the guy who makes the BBC most of it's income.
I am sure in the background the affair with Jimmy Savile and the lack of action on the part of BBC management in that instance has made them more cautious. However, it was stupid if BBC management indeed did compare Clarkson with Savile.
What I think should have happened is that Clarkson should have been suspended pending further investigation or a hearing. But the program to be continued, without Clarkson. That way the fans would be (relatively) happy, and Clarkson could get a fair investigation.
I believe -- and I consider myself a bit of an expert consumer, having seen and recorded all of Top Gear's episodes since Season 6 (2005, and you should see how much younger and fresher he was then) -- that it is time for a bit of "renewal" in the program. There's nothing that renews more than putting in another front man…
Peter