Author Topic: Ride Height  (Read 2462 times)

Harry

  • Full Member
  • Gold
  • *****
  • USA, TN, Knoxville
  • Posts: 744
Ride Height
« on: January 02, 2017, 03:50:55 »
I see that my 230SL looks low in front or high in rear.  Measuring from the star center to the wheel well lip suggests the issue is with the front.  It is measuring about 13 ins (rear about 14 ins).  It visually looks low in the front.

So what is the prime suspect?  I believe that everything is stock in the front end.  Seems that I've seen here that the subframe mounts are often guilty but I'd like to check them if possible before considering absorbing that cost.  Or maybe there are other possibilities?

Thanks,
Harry
Harry Bailey
Knoxville, TN
1966 230SL
Automatic

Cees Klumper

  • Full Member
  • Platinum
  • ******
  • USA, CA, Fallbrook
  • Posts: 5721
    • http://SL113.org
Re: Ride Height
« Reply #1 on: January 02, 2017, 08:35:39 »
The front springs, and/or someone placed too thin rubber spring seats.
Cees Klumper
1969 Mercedes 280 SL automatic
1968 Ford Mustang 302 V8
1961 Alfa Romeo Giulietta Sprint Coupe 1600
1962 FIAT 1500S OSCA convertible
1972 Lancia Fulvia Coupe 1.3
1983 Porsche 944 2.5
1990 Ford Bronco II

Tyler S

  • Associate Member
  • Platinum
  • ******
  • USA, CA, Encinitas
  • Posts: 1613
Re: Ride Height
« Reply #2 on: January 03, 2017, 03:04:19 »
Add subframe mounts to Cees' list.
50 yr old rubber parts are amost always bad. A combination of all the items add up to a noticable ride height difference.
1968 (67) 250sl. 4 speed manual. DB180 Silver
1955 220 Cabriolet A. White Grey
2019 E450 Wagon. Majestic Blue
1936 Ford PU Flathead V8. Creme on tan interior.
1989 Volkswagen T3 Westfailia Campmobile. Dove Grey (blue)