Hello everyone,
I have been trying to adjust the engine on my 280SL from 02/71, as it was running much too rich. It is an automatic, and I have adjusted the fuel/air mixture on the injection pump and with the air-screw, while maintaining idle at around 750 RPM in both P, N, 4 and R by adjusting the idle solenoid magnet, and at the same time monitoring the CO % in the exhaust.
But one thing really puzzled me: At idle (750 RPM) I can push the CO down to around and even below 2.0% with the gear lever in 4 and R, and still have the engine running smoothly and pulling strong both at idle and while driving. But by moving the gear lever to P or N and also at idle (750 RPM), the CO increases rapidly and stabilises around 8.0%, with the engine running less smoothly.
Why is there such a big difference in CO between P/N and 4/R??? 😮
I would have expected the opposite in idle (750 RPM), as the engine have to overcome more resistance in the automatic gearbox in 4 and R. Ok you give the engine more air, when the idle solenoid magnet is pushing on the linkage to maintain 750 RPM, but from 2% to 8 % CO is a huge difference.
I know that the CO should lie between 3.0-4.5% CO at idle, but if I adjust the car to this in P/N, then CO in 4/R would be much too low. Opposite, if I tune to 3.0-4.5% in 4/R, the CO would be much too high in P/N.
Do anyone have a good clue or explanation? 🙂
I myself have a thought about the venturi switch on the throttle house and its connection to the automatic gearbox modulation solenoid, because the gearbox is shifting (especially down) pretty hard, especially just before stopping the car and I have large jerks when shifting into R. But I am not much into how this system works. Could the reason for the large difference in CO lie here?
Looking forward to hear what you say and think.
Thanks! 😀
Cheers,
Christian
1971 280SL aut. (dark olive 291H)
1970 280SL man. (silver 180G)