Dear All
I am the currently (un)happy owner of an originally US specs silver 11/70 280SL with manual gear and the following configuration:
Engine: M130.981 (installed at some point from a w109, but with the same engine number stamped in as the original 983, except for the 981 - have you seen this before?)
Camshaft: 05 (with some wear on the cams)
Fuel injection pump: R24Y
Distributor - before: BOSCH 0231.116.062
Distributor - current: 123ignition
US throttle housing with constant vacuum
I have had the car since 2017, but it first came out of body renovation this summer, where I started driving it. I also have another 280SL (with aut. from 02/71) and I immediately noticed that the car was a lot weaker compared my other 280SL. So the first thing I did was to have the valve clearance checked and adjusted, and to replace the US emission control 062 distributor, which did not do anything good for the car, especially as none of the original emission control features like vacuum drive, the black box relays etc. worked anymore. I therefore installed instead a 123ignition like in my other 280SL, where I have very good experience with running it in program 8 and 0-3 degrees ADTC advance at idle (750 rpms). So I chose the same program 8 and set the advance to zero degrees at idle (750 rpm). I did also record a better and more precise ignition with the 123. However, I still lacked power!
My attention now shifted to the linkage system following the linkage tour here on sl113.org. I followed the procedure to the point, but recorded that the linkage to the injection pump had been set deliberately too long to around 245 mm to force the pump not to go to zero position, when at idle. I thought this was the key to the lack of power, and I therefore adjusted the fuel rod back to the factory 233 mm in accordance with the linkage tour document.
I now tried to tune the engine, and I first had to increase the fuel-air mixture a lot to compensate for the leaner mixture with the shorter 233mm fuel rod, and now letting the injection pump go to zero at idle. Instead of using the procedure in the linkage tour with the vaccum-meter and monitoring the idle speed, I instead used a CO meter in the exhaust aiming for the 3.5-4.5 %CO range at 750 rpms.
However, when now trying to tune the engine, I found it impossible to force the rpms in idle down below 1000 rpm, even with the air idle screw all in. Also the idle screw had very little to no influence on the idle speed. In that process I also noticed that the tip of the old idle screw had a large V-notch, which I found very odd, and assumed this was the reason I could not get the rpms down, as it was pulling air even with the screw all in. I therefore bought a new idle screw and installed this instead. But it still had no influence on the idle speed! :-/
Also, by reving the engine in neutral as well as driving the car, there were misfires and almost complete lack of power. But increasing the fuel mixture as well as increasing the ignition advance to mitigate this only made the idle rpms higher.
So the only options to arrive at lower idle rpms seemed to be by either lowering the ignition advance at idle to negative (BDTC), but that would give very poor performance at higher rpms, OR by again increasing the length of the fuel injection linkage rod, like it was initially, to effectively drown the engine down to 750-1000 rpms, but at the same time compensate on the fuel mixture screw on the pump to reach 3.5-4.5 %CO at 750 rpms.
Yesterday, I partially did this, but only forced the rpms down to 900-1000 rpms and adjusted the ignition at idle to around zero degrees to try a compromise setting. Fuel mixture was adjusted down to around 5.0-5.5 %CO. I also moved over into program F, as this seemed to give a much smoother engine response compared to program 8, when reving the engine in neutral.
I then drove the car for a longer distance (60-80 km), and it first went acceptably well on the highway at higher rpms (3000-3500 rpms), but on the return trip on smaller roads at lower rpms (typically 1500-2500), the engine gradually responded worse and worse with loosing power and misfires/engine cut-outs. I even had to increase the fuel mixture on the pump one click up on the return trip, just to get home.
My plan is now to return to the initial configuration with a much longer fuel rod length and a higher advance at idle - aiming at around 8-10 degrees ADTC and idle at 750 rpms, and trying to get back to program 8 on the 123ignition. But I suspect my poor power delivery will return and I will be back to square one! :-/
But before I do this, I would highly appreciate your input and reflections on my story above:
1) What do you think of my story/procedure above and my final adjustment plan?
2) Do you see me doing anything wrong, or could I do something else to make it run better?
3) What do you think the problem is with the engine, injection pump, ignition, etc.?
4) Remember I have a worn 05 cam in the engine. Do you think this could be a significant factor for the poor performance?
5) Same goes for the US air intake housing with constant vacuum supply - however I also have that on my other 280SL, and there it does not cause any problems with the 123ignition in program 8.
6) I don't know, if the fuel injection pump is out of calibration. Do you think the symptoms reported above indicate that this could be the case?
7) Any other thoughts, comments, suggestions?
I look forward to hear your reflections and comments. :-)
Best wishes and thanks in advance!
Christian
11/1970 MB 280SL (man)
02/1971 MB 280SL (aut)
1969 Volvo 1800S (man)