My Timevalve was the easiest installation I'd ever had; it fit like a glove back in 1988 and it's still there.
That said, I've never liked the Timevalve sound*. I've described it in previous posts, but to my ear it's brittle, harsh and loud. Originally, with the top down and the OEM system installed, I mostly heard a warm, full purr from the exhaust tip on acceleration; but now the sound seems to come up through the floorboard.
What I really miss is the feel of my first exhaust replacement, a 1974 Abarth. It burbled like a baby Ferrari -- and lasted all of 14,000 miles. Joe Alexander might remember the SuperSprint exhaust that came next; he installed it in 1976. Once again, a nice, warm, sporty sound with a propensity to easy rusting. In neither case did the larger diameter, angle-cut chrome tailpipes bother me, although I'd probably be out of the running at any concours today.
I may make a change with some corroboration of Vince's sock trick. If I can be confident that the steel corrosion can be controlled, I'll happily reserve my proven, reliable, unworn Timevalve to whoever wants it while I check with Joe, Pete Lesler, Manfred Pfeiffer and Gernold Nisius about how I can get my throaty rumble back.
(I guess I'd also ask Joe if there's any reason to suspect that the reduced back pressure I'd assumed as a cause of my Abarth/SuperSprint infatuation might have contributed to the valve/ring engine problems I suffered later.)
A radical option would be for all of us who are delighted with John Olsen's progressive-rate springs to call Minneapolis and see what it would take for him to develop an Abarth-sounding exhaust system, with near-stock chrome tips and shipped with a perfect-fitting pair of Vince's stocking stuffers.
* In all fairness, maybe the newer Timevalves are constructed differently and perhaps sound better; it might be worth a direct inquiry to the manufacturer.
Bill Greffin
Chicago
#22375