Does this make any sense?
Last year when my car was at Dr. Benz's he was not able to time it conventionally with a timing light; the distributor indexing was off as he said. He did it the old fashioned way (advance till pinging, then back off) and with some test runs got the car running correctly--neglecting the fuel issue but that's another topic.
So, for the fuel issue the car went into Karl-Heinz yesterday; he is a local mechanic who apprenticed in--you got it--Sindelfingen (on the 113 line), and who owns a 230SL.
I told him about the "distributor indexing" problem and the first thing he asked me was "Was the engine ever apart"? to which I said, yes, it was rebuilt by Metric. A smile comes to his face, he pulls out a pad and paper and makes a drawing. This is where "Does this make any sense?" comes in.
He explained verbally and with pictures that the piece with the timing marks on it can go on correctly, or 180 degrees out of phase. If it is installed 180 out, you won't see the timing marks when stroboscopically timing with #1 cylinder. HOWEVER, knowing that the 0 degree mark means TDC for #1 piston, if you are 180 degrees out on that timing mark plate, you will see TDC for the 4th piston in the firing order, or #6. Each 60 degrees of crankshaft rotation brings the next piston into TDC. So:
0 degrees, #1
60 degrees, #5
120 degrees, #3
180 degrees, #6
240 degrees, #2
300 degrees, #4
360 degrees = 0 degrees = #1
He said the bottom line is on my engine, you [probably] time with the #6 cylinder. He has not done it yet, but was very quick to come to this conclusion as he says he's seen this before on rebuilt engines.
I'm wanting to know to those who may have seen this or done it whether this makes any sense.
Michael Salemi
1969 280SL
Signal Red w/Black Leather
Restored