MB must have decided that the tougher mount was a better choice for both sides, which makes sense. Maybe early on in the original testing of the cars, they achieved better vibration damping using one softer mount, so the cars were slightly quieter, or had less "felt" vibration in the passenger compartment. But maybe they started seeing repeated "early" failures of the soft mount on the left, due to how much the big 6 cylinder weighs. I don't know, I'm just guessing.
I sent my VIN to an MB parts supplier and they came back with 2 different numbers, at about $114ea, and that was for a red-dot, and a plain.