I agree with Colin. Hemmels does not exactly have the shiny reputation it purports to have. Horror stories abound and their hubris in advertising they produce cars better than when the rolled off the assembly is suspect.
I guess the bottom line on this car is buyer beware.
Interesting observations, all. Be reminded that the inspection was NON INVASIVE, meaning no screw was turned, nothing was adjusted. Visual observation only, pretty much like the standard of practice for residential home inspections in the USA. A more thorough inspection would cost a small fortune, and to what or whose standard? What would you take apart? There was a test drive, but it proved to be too dangerous. Don't think Hemmels would have dared take it on the M4.
It's already turned into a Hemmel's Pile on, but be reminded that the work was done to the tune of £200,000 by a "Hampshire based restorer" and that should be identified.
So, our British friends: who in Hampshire is big and well known enough to convince someone to part with such a sum of money for such lousy work?
I'll agree completely that the report format and writing is a bit disjointed but don't let that detract from the photos and conclusions. Yes, the same raw data could be better organized and perhaps written a bit better without so much duplication etc. But, they (Hemmels) are not in the business of report writing...