Author Topic: Can someone critique this 250sl  (Read 2703 times)

Dondraperdfw

  • Junior Level
  • USA, TX, DFW
  • Posts: 3
Can someone critique this 250sl
« on: February 01, 2024, 17:02:47 »
Hello Folks... Newbie here. I feel the time has come for me to own a Pagoda. I own 109sl, 300 sel 6.3 and a 450sel 6.9 and a few other modern Benzes. Passionate about this brand.

This particular one caught my eye

https://rmsothebys.com/en/auctions/mi24/miami/lots/r0027-1967-mercedes-benz-250-sl-pagoda/1425257/photos

What do folks think about it.

One thing that bothers me is that it not in it's original color. How do pagoda collectors view that?

Any other comments or critique of this car?

1971 Mercedes 300 SEL 6.3
1979 Mercedes 450SEL 6.9
1961 Mercedes 190 SL
2021 Mercedes G63 AMG
2008 Mercedes SLR Roadster
2011 Mercedes SLS AMG coupe
2014 Mercedes SLS AMG Black
2009 Mercedes SL65 AMG Black
2021 Mercedes AMG GT Black
2008 Mercedes CLK63 AMG Black x2
2019 Mercedes S65 AMG sedan & Cab

JamesL

  • Full Member
  • Platinum
  • ******
  • United Kingdom, London, London
  • Posts: 3610
Re: Can someone critique this 250sl
« Reply #1 on: February 01, 2024, 17:25:12 »
Gut reaction is that seems like a load of (reserve) for a non- original colour. Stunning though it is.

Pics...
The firewall pad looks like I put it on. And I am useless.
Minor thing, the wing mirrors should be tallest part outermost (easy to revolve but you want a critique).
Nose on view, the battery tray on the right behind the radiator grille should be "black" so you don't see it. Imagine the car white and you'll see what I mean.
Rear view, the trim under the licence plate has two holes. They're not standard and an easy job to replace that part to "finish" the car, someone didn't
Tye trunk lid isn't straight (horizontal panel gap)
Steering wheel shot - the carpet up above the clutch pedal is loose, and looks like the under dash panel is missing
Dash wood loks nice and shiny
The plate riveted to the engine block looks out of place - I thought the numbers were always stamped on the block. But I am often wrong
What are the holes on the inner wing infront of the radiator expansion tank
Trunk carpet looks lovely but don't think it will have left the factory that way
I like the upholstered trunk, makes the car look nicely finished, but not original. And as for the lining of the trunk lid...
The tires are not exactly top spec - they'll do a turn but likely a cheaper option
I've never been in a car with A/C but the underdash unit looks too modern to me - may have been nicely trimmed and refinished making it look better than the original, but don't think that would have been what it looked like originally.

It may be a stunning place to sit and and a great drive, and you could not really restore one for less, but you might be able to do it better! That said, there's a load on here who'd argue an early 250 is the car to have
« Last Edit: February 01, 2024, 17:29:46 by JamesL »
James L
Oct69 RHD 280 in DB906 with cognac leather

rwmastel

  • Full Member
  • Platinum
  • ******
  • USA, OH, Canal Winchester
  • Posts: 4634
  • Pagoda SL Group: 20+ years and going strong!
Re: Can someone critique this 250sl
« Reply #2 on: February 01, 2024, 19:25:12 »
Gut reaction is that seems like a load of (reserve) for a non- original colour. Stunning though it is.
There is no reserve.

Pics...
The firewall pad looks like I put it on. And I am useless.
Minor thing, the wing mirrors should be tallest part outermost (easy to revolve but you want a critique).  Passenger is correct, driver's needs spun around.
Nose on view, the battery tray on the right behind the radiator grille should be "black" so you don't see it. Imagine the car white and you'll see what I mean.
Rear view, the trim under the licence plate has two holes. They're not standard and an easy job to replace that part to "finish" the car, someone didn't
Tye trunk lid isn't straight (horizontal panel gap)
Steering wheel shot - the carpet up above the clutch pedal is loose, and looks like the under dash panel is missing  Why is the steering wheel shot?
Dash wood looks nice and shiny  Too shiny, I would say.  Should be a matte finish, right?
The plate riveted to the engine block looks out of place - I thought the numbers were always stamped on the block. But I am often wrong  The numbers are stamped on the block, as well as on this plate
What are the holes on the inner wing infront of the radiator expansion tank  The original function of these holes has been debated on these forums before.  I believe they should have rubber plugs in them.
Trunk carpet looks lovely but don't think it will have left the factory that way  Yes, nice touch on the carpet.  Would like to see if there's rust underneath.
I like the upholstered trunk, makes the car look nicely finished, but not original. And as for the lining of the trunk lid...    I've never seen the trunk upholstered like that. Didn't even notice the black side upholstery until you mentioned it.  I've never seen the inside of the lid "decorated" like that, either!  Interesting choices by somebody.
The tires are not exactly top spec - they'll do a turn but likely a cheaper option
I've never been in a car with A/C but the underdash unit looks too modern to me - may have been nicely trimmed and refinished making it look better than the original, but don't think that would have been what it looked like originally.  Yes, I don't know what's up with that A/C unit under the dash.  Maybe a standard one upholstered, considering the trunk's treatment.

It may be a stunning place to sit and and a great drive, and you could not really restore one for less, but you might be able to do it better! Yes, you can probably find a car restored to greater originality standards, but you should just see how the auction goes here.  Might be worth buying for less than 6 figures?  There are astute auction watchers and market trackers here.
That said, there's a load on here who'd argue an early 250 is the car to have  Yes, it is the "early" style 250, so the trim looks like a 230 and lots of people like that.  The radio has fat 280-style knobs, hopefully the dash opening wasn't cut wider for a 280-sized radio.  The 5-speed is great, just hope it doesn't break in the future as parts are very hard to get.  It's a French car, maybe some yellow headlight bulbs are in order!
Dondraperdfw,

Welcome to the Group!  Glad you found us before buying.  We love to educate members to help them make better purchasing decisions.  I think JamesL did a very good job of finding the talking points, and many others will chime in.  I put comments in-line with James' comments.
« Last Edit: February 01, 2024, 19:30:14 by rwmastel »
Rodd

Did you search the forum before asking?
2017 C43 AMG
2006 Wrangler Rubicon
1966 230SL auto "Italian"

lreppond

  • Full Member
  • Gold
  • *****
  • USA, CA, San Leandro
  • Posts: 639
Re: Can someone critique this 250sl
« Reply #3 on: February 01, 2024, 19:46:53 »
Totally agree on all counts with James and Rodd.  Whoever did the restoration took a lot of liberties and it’s certainly not an accurate one: burl wood, headrests,  finishing of trunk, etc. The colors, interior choices etc make it look like an amalgamation of several variants (230, 250 and 280 SL’s) with nothing being truly correct for any. The A/C unit is one retailed by Buds Benz to resemble a FrigiKing.  Don’t know how good it works.  I think the 250 came with dealer installed Kuhlmeister units.

Knowing it’s a RM auction, it’ll go for top dollar.  If you just want one to enjoy, ok.  But if you’re in least concerned about authenticity or have a desire to show it, I think you can find better options. You’ll just need to be patient. 
~Len

1971 280 SL
576G red/251 Beige
4 speed manual
Family owned since new (father —> son)

Sead

  • Vendor
  • Silver
  • ****
  • Bosnia and Herzegovina, Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina, Sarajevo
  • Posts: 261
Re: Can someone critique this 250sl
« Reply #4 on: February 01, 2024, 20:09:23 »
sorry for hijacking your post but maybe my 230SL is smth you are looking for:
https://suchen.mobile.de/fahrzeuge/details.html?id=371053841
price negotiable

Sead
1964 230SL

JamesL

  • Full Member
  • Platinum
  • ******
  • United Kingdom, London, London
  • Posts: 3610
Re: Can someone critique this 250sl
« Reply #5 on: February 01, 2024, 21:27:00 »
Rodd, thanks
"Steering wheel shot" was a reference to the photo of the steering wheel... :D
James L
Oct69 RHD 280 in DB906 with cognac leather

Dondraperdfw

  • Junior Level
  • USA, TX, DFW
  • Posts: 3
Re: Can someone critique this 250sl
« Reply #6 on: February 01, 2024, 21:33:58 »
Thank you folks. Appreciate the feedback.

Auctions tend to bring out these glitzy cars that show well in an auction because a lot of what people bid on is the emotion and what they see.
There was this on on Barrett Jackson last week

 https://www.barrett-jackson.com/Events/Event/Details/1964-MERCEDES-BENZ-230SL-ROADSTER-271352

Fenders were all new, old ones were cut up because of rust and new ones were put in. Fenders were purchased as spare parts and imported from Germany. Showed really well though

I want to add one Pagoda to my collection but it has to be a top notch example, restored and original

Preferably an optional 5 speed ZF one.
1971 Mercedes 300 SEL 6.3
1979 Mercedes 450SEL 6.9
1961 Mercedes 190 SL
2021 Mercedes G63 AMG
2008 Mercedes SLR Roadster
2011 Mercedes SLS AMG coupe
2014 Mercedes SLS AMG Black
2009 Mercedes SL65 AMG Black
2021 Mercedes AMG GT Black
2008 Mercedes CLK63 AMG Black x2
2019 Mercedes S65 AMG sedan & Cab

JamesL

  • Full Member
  • Platinum
  • ******
  • United Kingdom, London, London
  • Posts: 3610
Re: Can someone critique this 250sl
« Reply #7 on: February 01, 2024, 22:00:23 »
There's those that would say you could have restored OR original, but not both.

This car is certainly restored, not sure how well
James L
Oct69 RHD 280 in DB906 with cognac leather

rwmastel

  • Full Member
  • Platinum
  • ******
  • USA, OH, Canal Winchester
  • Posts: 4634
  • Pagoda SL Group: 20+ years and going strong!
Re: Can someone critique this 250sl
« Reply #8 on: February 01, 2024, 23:20:37 »
I want to add one Pagoda to my collection but it has to be a top notch example, restored and original
Restored and original are opposite things.  It's only original once.  Maybe you want restored and factory correct.  Members here are a wealth of information regarding originality, correctness.  It's amazing.

I believe there are a couple excellent Pagoda specialists in the DFW area who post in these forums occasionally.

I hope everything in your nice collection is getting driven regularly.
« Last Edit: February 01, 2024, 23:27:48 by rwmastel »
Rodd

Did you search the forum before asking?
2017 C43 AMG
2006 Wrangler Rubicon
1966 230SL auto "Italian"

Lorsar

  • Membership Administrator
  • Silver
  • ****
  • USA, NC, Charlotte
  • Posts: 267
  • 1968 280SL (US)
Re: Can someone critique this 250sl
« Reply #9 on: February 02, 2024, 00:04:41 »
That steering wheel looks like it was painted to match the interior.   It may have been black originallly (see the chip bottom left)  And the ridges are gone.
Lori
1968 280SL (US)

mclewis

  • Full Member
  • Senior
  • ***
  • USA, NJ, Saddle River
  • Posts: 170
Re: Can someone critique this 250sl
« Reply #10 on: February 02, 2024, 00:31:06 »
On the RMSotheby’s car, to me, both in the front angle photo and the side photo, the driver’s looks like it is hung a bit low.
Marc Lewis
1968 280SL 728H/728H, 248, 746
2020 C300
2021 E450 All Terrain

thy306

  • Full Member
  • Junior Level
  • *
  • Canada, Alberta, Calgary
  • Posts: 12
Re: Can someone critique this 250sl
« Reply #11 on: February 02, 2024, 03:36:40 »
This looks like the car for sale at Speedart Motorsports a while back. Was listed forever. I had done some research at the time - it was sold at RM in 2019 for $145K. Then listed at Speedart for $250K last year. I eventually found someone who knew the car well. If this is the same one, all he could say to me was “stay away from this one”. Wish I knew more than that!

Super newbie here who loves this site. In fact, it’s my first post. My new to me Pagoda is getting some work done and hopefully will be ready for spring. Fingers crossed. I’ll be sure to “officially” post when she’s ready to roll :)

450sl

  • Full Member
  • Silver
  • ****
  • Netherlands, Gelderland, zelhem
  • Posts: 494
Re: Can someone critique this 250sl
« Reply #12 on: February 02, 2024, 14:03:37 »
Looks to me speedo and rev counter not 100 percent positioned.

upholstery dashboard not done perfect.

paint chip behind rear right wheel arch and looks to me with some filler...




john.mancini

  • Full Member
  • Gold
  • *****
  • USA, FL, Nokomis
  • Posts: 652
Re: Can someone critique this 250sl
« Reply #13 on: February 02, 2024, 15:04:05 »
I totally agree with the comments. I would stay miles away from this 250SL, especially at that pricing estimate.

« Last Edit: February 10, 2024, 02:17:14 by john.mancini »
John
65 230SL 519 Red 4-sp
98 911 cab
56 Ford F100
08 Porsche RS60 Spyder
23 Z4M40i

Alex D

  • Full Member
  • Silver
  • ****
  • USA, NC, Cary
  • Posts: 313
Re: Can someone critique this 250sl
« Reply #14 on: February 02, 2024, 19:41:11 »
Dondraperdfw,

I would take serious look at Sead's car, very legit.  Know a restorer who has seen it and was extremely impressed. 

 
Alex D
1967 250 SL
Original 140K mi
181 Light Beige, with  112 Turquoise Interior

SEB

  • Full Member
  • Silver
  • ****
  • Germany, Berlin, Berlin
  • Posts: 262
Re: Can someone critique this 250sl
« Reply #15 on: February 04, 2024, 12:32:44 »
I have a 250 SL from March 1967 and for a long time I have been wondering how many versions of Pagoda seats there were?
The backrest in my chair is thinner and probably not suitable for mounting a headrest
Sebastian
1967 250 SL, 4 Speed, Euro spec, Tunis beige (462H),

Jonny B

  • Pagoda SL Board
  • Platinum
  • ******
  • USA, CA, San Marcos
  • Posts: 4198
Re: Can someone critique this 250sl
« Reply #16 on: February 04, 2024, 17:57:53 »
A number of nits, some easy to fix (no subframe mounts present, no hood bumpers, those kind of things)
Tool kits are not correct

Much more concerning - check the door fit on the driver's side especially noticeable on photo 10 of 44
Hood gaps (in addition to the trunk gaps James L notes)

Wheel wells should be body color

Hood hinges are not painted and should be
Also the hood catch point in the center of the firewall should be painted body color

Heater levers are a mismatch. The ones on the top are correct for, but the bottom two are the rubber replacements seen in the later US cars.

One item that also caught my eye is the fit of the glove box door - I think this may have the best fit I have yet seen on a Pagoda!
Jonny B
1967 250 SL Auto, DB 568
1970 280 SL Auto, DB 904
1966 Morris Mini Minor

rwmastel

  • Full Member
  • Platinum
  • ******
  • USA, OH, Canal Winchester
  • Posts: 4634
  • Pagoda SL Group: 20+ years and going strong!
Re: Can someone critique this 250sl
« Reply #17 on: February 05, 2024, 04:40:53 »
Super newbie here who loves this site. In fact, it’s my first post. My new to me Pagoda is getting some work done and hopefully will be ready for spring. Fingers crossed. I’ll be sure to “officially” post when she’s ready to roll :)
Welcome to the Group!  Do you have the only Pagoda in Alberta?   :D
Rodd

Did you search the forum before asking?
2017 C43 AMG
2006 Wrangler Rubicon
1966 230SL auto "Italian"

BobH

  • Full Member
  • Gold
  • *****
  • United Kingdom, England, MALDON
  • Posts: 968
Re: Can someone critique this 250sl
« Reply #18 on: February 05, 2024, 18:46:55 »
I have a 250 SL from March 1967 and for a long time I have been wondering how many versions of Pagoda seats there were?
The backrest in my chair is thinner and probably not suitable for mounting a headrest

There were a number of changes to the seats over the years, but all seats can accept head rests, have a look on here

https://www.sl113.org/forums/index.php?topic=3040.0
February 1965 230SL Automatic
UK delivered RHD
Papyrus white, blue hard top & hub caps
Blue soft top
Blue leather

stickandrudderman

  • Vendor
  • Platinum
  • ******
  • United Kingdom, England, Richmond
  • Posts: 2924
    • http://www.colinferns.com
Re: Can someone critique this 250sl
« Reply #19 on: February 05, 2024, 19:31:59 »
As I've said many times before, there are plenty of good restorers out there; there are few good Pagoda restorers.
This looks like it's been done by the former.
It's a nice car that looks like it will give a new owner lots of pleasure unless they subject it to the scrutiny of anyone who can spot the ireggularities......
« Last Edit: February 06, 2024, 15:45:19 by stickandrudderman »

rwmastel

  • Full Member
  • Platinum
  • ******
  • USA, OH, Canal Winchester
  • Posts: 4634
  • Pagoda SL Group: 20+ years and going strong!
Re: Can someone critique this 250sl
« Reply #20 on: February 05, 2024, 20:43:56 »
sorry for hijacking your post but maybe my 230SL is smth you are looking for:
https://suchen.mobile.de/fahrzeuge/details.html?id=371053841
price negotiable

Sead
Dondraperdfw,

I would take serious look at Sead's car, very legit.  Know a restorer who has seen it and was extremely impressed.
Yes, Sead has a very nice car for sale.

Another member has this for sale.
https://www.sl113.org/forums/index.php?topic=37178.0
Rodd

Did you search the forum before asking?
2017 C43 AMG
2006 Wrangler Rubicon
1966 230SL auto "Italian"

Werhettes

  • Junior Level
  • USA, LA, Los Angeles
  • Posts: 1
Re: Can someone critique this 250sl
« Reply #21 on: February 06, 2024, 14:53:42 »
It's a comfortable car, but the design always attracts me more. Buying them at auction can be a risky business. I remember a few years ago, there was a slightly high-profile case when a 1964 Mercedes-Benz 230 SL was sold at a Bonhams auction for $700,000.Later it turned out that rust was everywhere
2011 Mercedes SLS AMG
2008 Mercedes CLK63 AMG Black x2
spacemanoyunu full review is here

rwmastel

  • Full Member
  • Platinum
  • ******
  • USA, OH, Canal Winchester
  • Posts: 4634
  • Pagoda SL Group: 20+ years and going strong!
Re: Can someone critique this 250sl
« Reply #22 on: February 06, 2024, 20:17:31 »
Werhettes,

Welcome to the Group!  I see this is your first post.  If you feel so inclined, you can introduce yourself here:
https://www.sl113.org/forums/index.php?topic=529.0
Rodd

Did you search the forum before asking?
2017 C43 AMG
2006 Wrangler Rubicon
1966 230SL auto "Italian"

thy306

  • Full Member
  • Junior Level
  • *
  • Canada, Alberta, Calgary
  • Posts: 12
Re: Can someone critique this 250sl
« Reply #23 on: February 09, 2024, 18:16:46 »
Welcome to the Group!  Do you have the only Pagoda in Alberta?   :D

Haha I sure hope not but there can’t be many! :)

Dondraperdfw

  • Junior Level
  • USA, TX, DFW
  • Posts: 3
Re: Can someone critique this 250sl
« Reply #24 on: March 01, 2024, 20:50:56 »
Sold for 104k.
1971 Mercedes 300 SEL 6.3
1979 Mercedes 450SEL 6.9
1961 Mercedes 190 SL
2021 Mercedes G63 AMG
2008 Mercedes SLR Roadster
2011 Mercedes SLS AMG coupe
2014 Mercedes SLS AMG Black
2009 Mercedes SL65 AMG Black
2021 Mercedes AMG GT Black
2008 Mercedes CLK63 AMG Black x2
2019 Mercedes S65 AMG sedan & Cab