Author Topic: The most hideous 113?  (Read 138 times)

stickandrudderman

  • Vendor
  • Platinum
  • ******
  • United Kingdom, England, Richmond
  • Posts: 2934
    • http://www.colinferns.com
The most hideous 113?
« on: December 22, 2024, 19:00:24 »

AndrewB

  • Full Member
  • Senior
  • ***
  • , Channel Islands, Forest
  • Posts: 174
Re: The most hideous 113?
« Reply #1 on: December 22, 2024, 20:27:00 »
That is a waste of a W113 chassis !
1969 280SL (unrestored)
1970 280SL (fully restored)
1971 Range Rover Suffix A Kingsley Restomod
1987 500SL
2002 Porsche 996 Targa
2011 Landrover Defender TdCi
2019 Mercedes S560 Cabriolet

EeVeeWee

  • Full Member
  • Silver
  • ****
  • Netherlands, Utrecht, Leusden
  • Posts: 388
Re: The most hideous 113?
« Reply #2 on: December 22, 2024, 20:47:38 »
 :(
Again something else.

Pawel66

  • Full Member
  • Platinum
  • ******
  • Poland, Mazowieckie, Konstancin-Jeziorna
  • Posts: 5514
Re: The most hideous 113?
« Reply #3 on: December 22, 2024, 21:32:16 »
I think the owner should be prosecuted.
Pawel

280SL 1970 automatic 180G Silver
W128 220SE
W121 190SL
G-class

Jack the Knife

  • Full Member
  • Silver
  • ****
  • USA, FL, Vero Beach
  • Posts: 373
Re: The most hideous 113?
« Reply #4 on: December 22, 2024, 21:56:42 »
>look at the engine!
>*shows a plastic cover*
>'Oh my gosh!'

I guess it's just a body, not a chassis... and who knows how much of it is original. Theoretically a lot of that could just be reproduction panels and trim.

Imagine someone stepping on that weird side skirt. I do admit, I have wondered what an air dam would have looked like on a car like ours but . . . better-designed. I do recall seeing some front spoilers on some R107 Euro cars that resembled some off of the W113 concepts (where the under-bumper fog lights would typically be installed).

Here's an idea from 5 seconds in photoshop.
1964 230SL
2015 G550