Thanks, Joe. Those diagrams that you posted are very informative.
I have a practical issue with the diagrams, however: the connections are difficult. They want you to either (A) go under the battery and connect the meter to pin 7 (and ground) or else (B) connect the dwell meter to the ballast resistors; unfortunately, the inlet of the .6 ohm resistor is tough to get to.
If you remove the cap and rotor, it is incredibly easy to just connect the dwell meter to the clip where the lead to the points is attached. Since I'm a little lazy, this really appeals to me.
A neighbor and fellow 113'er, Dan Walsh, also had an idea: he suggested using a needle to penetrate the insulation of the green wire that comes out of the distributor (it connects the points to pin 7), and take the reading there. I wanted to see if my reading, taken at the clip with the distributor cap off, would be the same as a reading in a normal idle, with the cap on.
I tried Dan's method (the needle) and I got the same dwell reading during idle as I had gotten using my easy method (connecting to the clip and cranking the engine with the cap off).
(Incidentally, my meter actually gives me a reading at the coil as well, but it is several degrees different from the accurate readings taken from the points.)
Finally, measuring the dwell with the cap and rotor removed makes it incredibly easy to set the points, since you don't need to put the cap and rotor back on each time you adjust the points gap.
I guess some traditionalists might say that you need to have the engine running to get a good dwell reading. Perhaps it's the transistor, but for some reason I get an accurate reading at the clip just by just cranking the engine with the distributor cap off.
If anyone else wants to compare dwell readings using my method and something more traditional, I'd be delighted to hear the results.
Bruce
1971 Copper 280SL Automatic