Author Topic: dynamat the hood?  (Read 5702 times)

blue230sl

  • Guest
dynamat the hood?
« on: November 12, 2007, 20:56:47 »
has anybody done this? if so does it reduce engine noise in the cabin when the hardtop is on?

john
64 230sl
89 190e 2.6

blue230sl

  • Guest
Re: dynamat the hood?
« Reply #1 on: November 12, 2007, 21:03:12 »
never mind - found the answer

john
64 230sl
89 190e 2.6

rmmchl

  • Full Member
  • Silver
  • ****
  • USA, WV, Charleston
  • Posts: 470
Re: dynamat the hood?
« Reply #2 on: November 12, 2007, 21:48:45 »
so does it reduce noice in the cabin-these cars are noisy especially with the sort top up
michael romeo           
1967  250sl
signal red

jsaylor

  • Guest
Re: dynamat the hood?
« Reply #3 on: November 12, 2007, 23:38:15 »
I recall talk of excess heat within the engine compartment if you dynamat the hood.  


Jim Saylor
Kauai, Hawaii
'65 230SL

blue230sl

  • Guest
Re: dynamat the hood?
« Reply #4 on: November 13, 2007, 18:40:30 »
sorry, should have been more specific.
in a thread about HOOD INSULATION PAD, mike salemi wrote:
I hear on good authority that you should NOT use a hood pad. The hood was made of aluminum specifically to dissapate heat; blocking the heat transfer is asking for trouble.

so, besides dynamty on the floor ( and the shop i went to used a similar product called ROADKILL) i've found taking the hardtop off reduces cabin noise significantly :D , and makes it more fun as well....

john
64 230sl
89 190e 2.6

Raymond

  • Full Member
  • Platinum
  • ******
  • USA, FL, Jacksonville
  • Posts: 1206
    • GemstoneMediaInc.com
Re: dynamat the hood?
« Reply #5 on: November 15, 2007, 20:45:21 »
Using the heat logic, how does one explain the trunk lid and doors?  The hood is aluminum for weight on the "Sport Light".  Still, I would think dynamat would be a bad choice for heat and other reasons including the clearance over some points on the engine and weight on the spring.

Ray
'68 280SL 4-spd Coupe
Ray
'68 280SL 5-spd "California" Coupe