Author Topic: W113 vs Boxster  (Read 30851 times)

Paddy_Crow

  • Guest
Re: W113 vs Boxster
« Reply #50 on: February 01, 2008, 09:11:21 »
I remember back in the late seventies when they released the 928, all the purists derided it for not being a real Porsche. The Boxster has a reputation around here for being a "Chick" car.

Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch...

peterm

  • Guest
Re: W113 vs Boxster
« Reply #51 on: February 01, 2008, 09:50:25 »
Thanks to the sopranos the boxster is the "Porsche with panties"
Purists be dammed I love my water cooled 911 with all its electronic nannies.  Those that deny it as a true Porsche can spend their time extricating their car from guardrails when the rear end swings around as it ahs a nasty tendency to do.  It is a driving experience on a daily basis for me, the aural pleasure of the PSE exhaust combined with the everpresent ability to press the right foot and make things a blur is without compare. Tooling arond town in the 113 is a different type of experience but not a seat of pants joy that the porsche is.

Mike Hughes

  • Full Member
  • Platinum
  • ******
  • USA, VA, Blue Grass
  • Posts: 1750
Re: W113 vs Boxster
« Reply #52 on: February 01, 2008, 16:20:30 »
The Boxster is what Porsche would have done with the 914 and 914/6 if they hadn't been trying to do it on the cheap while also trying to anticipate the proposed U.S. roll-over standards that all but killed drop-top cars in the 1970s.  Now, If I was trying to choose between a well sorted 914/6 and an equally well sorted Pagoda SL it would be a hard choice - both cars have loads of character and period ambiance.  But If I had to choose between my SL and a Boxster the Pagoda would win hands down.

- Mike Hughes  -ô¿ô-
  1966 230SL Auto P/S
  Havanna Brown (408)
  Light Beige (181)
  Cream M-B Tex (121)

- Mike Hughes  -ô¿ô-
  1966 230SL Auto P/S
  Havana Brown (408)
  Light Beige (181)
  Cream M-B Tex (121)

hauser

  • Guest
Re: W113 vs Boxster
« Reply #53 on: February 01, 2008, 17:12:08 »
The Boxter will only depreciate while the Pagoda will only get more valuable.

1969 280sl 5 spd
Gainesville, Fl.

JimVillers

  • Full Member
  • Gold
  • *****
  • USA, VA, Virginia Beach
  • Posts: 573
Re: W113 vs Boxster
« Reply #54 on: February 01, 2008, 19:48:42 »
The windshield wipers clear the rain on my Boxster S, I use RainX (not wipers) when it rains on my 230SL.  Totally different cars whose purposes do not cross for me.

Plus the 113 club has a better club for my needs.

Jim Villers
190SL, 230SL 5-Speed, MGB 5-Speed, Boxster S
« Last Edit: February 01, 2008, 19:50:21 by JimVillers »
Jim Villers
190SL, 230SL 5-Speed, MGB 5-Speed, MGB GT V8 RHD (real MG), 2016 SLK

rob walker

  • Guest
Re: W113 vs Boxster
« Reply #55 on: February 05, 2008, 08:33:27 »
Riccardo, dont keep us in suspense. How was the Havana Pagoda?

Rob Walker
1968 280SL papyrus white/green leather
Spain and Turkey

France

  • Associate Member
  • Silver
  • ****
  • Austria, Vorarlberg, Schruns
  • Posts: 402
Re: W113 vs Boxster
« Reply #56 on: February 05, 2008, 12:11:18 »
Naj,

On the cols, you can always shift down...  :D

And then you can drive home on the motorway in comfort!  Happy motoring.  JA's de man!

Trice
1968 280SL US, signal red/bl leather, auto, kinder seat
Sarasota FL; Alsace France; Switzerland
Think of your Pagoda as a woman with a past...stable now including a 92 911 Carrera 2 Tiptronic
Trice
1968 280SL US, signal red/bl leather, auto, kinder seat
Austrian Alps
Think of your Pagoda as a woman with a past...

RGubbioli

  • Guest
Re: W113 vs Boxster
« Reply #57 on: February 06, 2008, 04:21:42 »
quote:
Originally posted by rob walker

Riccardo, dont keep us in suspense. How was the Havana Pagoda?



Rob, unfortunately unexpected guests on Saturday meant I didn't get the chance to go! Nearly thought of making a day trip for the lot of us but, then again, they wanted to see the sights of London so no can do.

Therefore I remain a Pagoda virgin...

dum

  • Guest
Re: W113 vs Boxster
« Reply #58 on: October 15, 2009, 19:35:21 »
Check this out, a friend's Boxster S & my early 250sl.

So different, so nice.

A pity that no one stopped to have a look at the Porsche!

abe280SL

  • Guest
Re: W113 vs Boxster
« Reply #59 on: October 15, 2009, 20:19:46 »
No brainer...you have a daily driver so you must have a W113.  Sorry, when I think of Porsche I think of 911s....all other P cars are not even worth giving the "P wave" or the "hello light flash".  Dont get the 911 wantabe....For the money, get yourself a  real P car..either an 83SC BULLET PROOF or late 87-89 9ll.  Those cars will still maintain there vallue.  A Boxter....geeezzz
what kind of question is that!!!????
IMHO as always...and I am not biased ;D
abe
« Last Edit: October 15, 2009, 20:23:25 by abe280SL »

RickM

  • Guest
Re: W113 vs Boxster
« Reply #60 on: October 16, 2009, 14:44:06 »

More depreciation, MPG and airbags in the porker


A well bought, preowned Boxster will hold it's value.

Referring to a Boxster as a "porker", when comparing to a 113, is pretty funny. (At least the 113 isn't der Panzerwagen / 107)

That said, I've never been a fan of the car but know others who state they're quite capable vehicles.

Kayvan

  • Guest
Re: W113 vs Boxster
« Reply #61 on: October 16, 2009, 16:23:13 »
I perused the 5 pages of posts, and no one mention the widely publicized engine defects of early Boxsters.

The first few years had engine casting defects, IMS seal failures which basically leaked non-stop; people used to joke the Check Engine light means Change Engine. Many were warrantied, many were not .

They fixed the issue, however, if you see an early < '99, cheap car stay away.

Re: v. 113

-Porsche prestige v. M-B classic......dont do it for status....a recent Miata will be more fun/less headaches
-The Boxtser will have minimal long term appreciation....check 944 Turbo Values today
-The Boxster has minimal presence v. 113; its now dated, and looks generic
-The Boxster will cost a lot less in long run v. ANY vinateg car
-The Boxster will provide cooler a/c, better heat, sound insulation, better crusing gearing etc.
-It is not like a 911.  I raced a 911 and Boxster back to back....Boxster had inferior chassis shake/shudder, dull steering/brake feedback, low power.

If you are looking for a modern summer roadster I would expand your search to TT, Z3, Z4; SLK and even Vette.  I did the lightly used Luxo Euro GT in the 90s via a '85 M635 CSI and in retrospect should have gone with a Vette!
« Last Edit: October 16, 2009, 16:47:30 by Kayvan »

john.mancini

  • Full Member
  • Gold
  • *****
  • USA, FL, Nokomis
  • Posts: 652
Re: W113 vs Boxster
« Reply #62 on: October 19, 2009, 15:05:45 »
Hi Riccardo,
I have been fortunatel to have owned both. I sold the Boxster S, still have two Pagodas. As you know well, they are two different animals that will have their pros and cons. I love driving my 280Sl's. They are great cars. However, if 300 to 500 mile trips are part of my regular schedule (as you mentioned), a new car will be more comfortable, more safe, and less likely to have issues than an older car will.
John Mancini
John
65 230SL 519 Red 4-sp
98 911 cab
56 Ford F100
08 Porsche RS60 Spyder
23 Z4M40i